PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UP vs. MBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UP vs. MBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP) and MBX Biosciences, Inc (MBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UP achieves a -37.22% return, which is significantly lower than MBX's 12.59% return.


UP

1D
8.85%
1M
63.82%
YTD
-37.22%
6M
-41.41%
1Y
-69.02%
3Y*
-47.02%
5Y*
-66.71%
10Y*

MBX

1D
-4.67%
1M
9.43%
YTD
12.59%
6M
18.92%
1Y
242.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UP vs. MBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
UP
Wheels Up Experience Inc.
-37.22%-60.22%-24.31%
MBX
MBX Biosciences, Inc
12.59%71.13%-19.87%

Correlation

The correlation between UP and MBX is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2024

0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UP:

$297.87M

MBX:

$1.65B

EPS

UP:

-$7.82

MBX:

-$2.30

Total Revenue (TTM)

UP:

$727.89M

MBX:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

UP:

$27.38M

MBX:

-$160.00K

EBITDA (TTM)

UP:

-$176.99M

MBX:

-$96.31M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UP vs. MBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UP
UP Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
UP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
UP Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
UP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
UP Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

MBX
MBX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
MBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
MBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UP vs. MBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP) and MBX Biosciences, Inc (MBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UPMBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.39

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

6.19

-6.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.08

11.83

-12.91

UP vs. MBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UP Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the MBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UP and MBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UP vs. MBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UP drawdown since its inception was -99.78%, which is greater than MBX's maximum drawdown of -77.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UP and MBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UPMBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.78%

-77.71%

-22.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-92.39%

-37.60%

-54.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-95.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.64%

-17.69%

-81.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-78.91%

-34.85%

-44.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

66.44%

19.65%

+46.79%

Volatility

UP vs. MBX - Volatility Comparison

Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP) has a higher volatility of 39.97% compared to MBX Biosciences, Inc (MBX) at 24.53%. This indicates that UP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UPMBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

39.97%

24.53%

+15.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

97.68%

60.13%

+37.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

135.85%

135.18%

+0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

121.23%

119.14%

+2.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

115.04%

119.14%

-4.10%

Dividends

UP vs. MBX - Dividend Comparison

Neither UP nor MBX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

UP vs. MBX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Wheels Up Experience Inc. and MBX Biosciences, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
168.92M
0
(UP) Total Revenue
(MBX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


UP and MBX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UP has higher volatility (39.97%) compared to MBX (24.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UP dropped -99.78% vs MBX's -77.71%.

MBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UP and MBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer