PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UOPIX vs. MLPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UOPIX vs. MLPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund (UOPIX) and ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund (MLPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UOPIX achieves a 42.41% return, which is significantly higher than MLPIX's 8.56% return. Over the past 10 years, UOPIX has outperformed MLPIX with an annualized return of 34.63%, while MLPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.65% annualized return.


UOPIX

1D
0.94%
1M
22.21%
YTD
42.41%
6M
38.29%
1Y
86.40%
3Y*
49.52%
5Y*
25.25%
10Y*
34.63%

MLPIX

1D
1.03%
1M
2.02%
YTD
8.56%
6M
8.62%
1Y
19.28%
3Y*
12.01%
5Y*
5.78%
10Y*
8.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UOPIX vs. MLPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UOPIX
ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund
42.41%30.26%41.75%115.97%-60.70%48.28%86.57%80.53%-9.41%68.58%
MLPIX
ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund
8.56%5.48%9.65%13.32%-8.61%28.23%1.85%24.02%-13.08%10.45%

Correlation

The correlation between UOPIX and MLPIX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2001

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between UOPIX and MLPIX has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UOPIX vs. MLPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UOPIX
UOPIX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
UOPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UOPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
UOPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
UOPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
UOPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPIX
MLPIX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
MLPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UOPIX vs. MLPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund (UOPIX) and ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund (MLPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UOPIXMLPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.24

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

1.96

+1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.66

6.60

+6.06

UOPIX vs. MLPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UOPIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is higher than the MLPIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UOPIX and MLPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UOPIXMLPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80

1.39

+1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.30

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.41

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.34

-0.22

Drawdowns

UOPIX vs. MLPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UOPIX drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, which is greater than MLPIX's maximum drawdown of -60.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UOPIX and MLPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UOPIXMLPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.80%

-60.11%

-39.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.97%

-10.68%

-14.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.52%

-23.24%

-19.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.01%

-23.24%

-41.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.01%

-45.96%

-19.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.02%

-0.47%

-42.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.82%

-9.37%

-75.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.08%

3.16%

+3.92%

Volatility

UOPIX vs. MLPIX - Volatility Comparison

ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund (UOPIX) has a higher volatility of 8.96% compared to ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund (MLPIX) at 4.00%. This indicates that UOPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UOPIXMLPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.96%

4.00%

+4.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.35%

10.47%

+13.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.12%

15.10%

+17.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.11%

19.49%

+25.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.17%

21.40%

+22.77%

UOPIX vs. MLPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UOPIX has a 1.47% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPIX's 1.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

UOPIX vs. MLPIX - Dividend Comparison

UOPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.83%, more than MLPIX's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MLPIX
ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund
0.43%0.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.89%0.22%0.40%3.92%10.95%0.56%
UOPIX
ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund
12.83%18.27%0.41%0.00%5.64%11.03%9.78%5.78%6.73%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UOPIX and MLPIX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UOPIX has higher volatility (8.96%) compared to MLPIX (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UOPIX dropped -99.80% vs MLPIX's -60.11%.

UOPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UOPIX and MLPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer