PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
UNAVX vs. ABRZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

UNAVX vs. ABRZX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

UNAVX (USA Mutuals All Seasons Fund) and ABRZX (Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past 5 years, UNAVX returned 5.71%/yr vs 3.66%/yr for ABRZX. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UNAVX charges 1.99%/yr vs 1.41%/yr for ABRZX.

Performance

UNAVX vs. ABRZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USA Mutuals All Seasons Fund (UNAVX) and Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A (ABRZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UNAVX achieves a -3.06% return, which is significantly lower than ABRZX's 16.30% return.

UNAVX

1D
-1.25%
1M
-1.18%
YTD
-3.06%
6M
-3.28%
1Y
-0.84%
3Y*
2.25%
5Y*
5.71%
10Y*
—

ABRZX

1D
-1.15%
1M
-2.67%
YTD
16.30%
6M
15.73%
1Y
23.30%
3Y*
10.67%
5Y*
3.66%
10Y*
4.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UNAVX vs. ABRZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UNAVX
USA Mutuals All Seasons Fund		-3.06%1.91%6.76%3.44%6.91%11.74%-8.36%25.57%-4.91%4.62%
ABRZX
Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A		16.30%8.20%3.14%5.97%-14.96%9.36%9.20%9.43%-7.01%3.13%

Correlation

The correlation between UNAVX and ABRZX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2017

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

USA Mutuals All Seasons Fund

Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A

Often compared with UNAVX:
UNAVX vs. TTIFXUNAVX vs. SFHYXUNAVX vs. VICEXUNAVX vs. SPYUNAVX vs. COTZXUNAVX vs. GOIIXUNAVX vs. SIOAX
Often compared with ABRZX:
ABRZX vs. HFSAXABRZX vs. TTIFXABRZX vs. GUGABRZX vs. MOJOXABRZX vs. SFHYXABRZX vs. PMYRXABRZX vs. GPIFX

Return for Risk

UNAVX vs. ABRZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
UNAVX
UNAVX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
UNAVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UNAVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
UNAVX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
UNAVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
UNAVX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
ABRZX
ABRZX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ABRZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABRZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABRZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ABRZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABRZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UNAVX vs. ABRZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USA Mutuals All Seasons Fund (UNAVX) and Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A (ABRZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

UNAVXABRZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.11
2.49

-2.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-0.11
3.29

-3.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.47

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

5.50

-5.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.14

17.54

-17.68

UNAVX vs. ABRZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UNAVX Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the ABRZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UNAVX and ABRZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UNAVX vs. ABRZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNAVX drawdown since its inception was -30.05%, which is greater than ABRZX's maximum drawdown of -26.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNAVX and ABRZX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

UNAVXABRZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.05%

-26.62%

-3.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.10%

-4.25%

-3.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.10%

-18.28%

+10.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.10%

-19.33%

+11.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-26.62%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.15%

-4.04%

-2.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.75%

-4.74%

-0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

1.33%

+2.55%

Volatility

UNAVX vs. ABRZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USA Mutuals All Seasons Fund (UNAVX) is 2.09%, while Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A (ABRZX) has a volatility of 3.22%. This indicates that UNAVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABRZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

UNAVXABRZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.09%

3.22%

-1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.27%

8.26%

-3.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.17%

9.37%

-4.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.75%

12.26%

-4.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.79%

10.93%

+1.86%

UNAVX vs. ABRZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UNAVX has a 1.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ABRZX's 1.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

UNAVX vs. ABRZX - Dividend Comparison

UNAVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than ABRZX's 2.90% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABRZX
Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A		2.90%3.38%13.28%2.21%0.00%26.02%1.18%6.49%0.00%6.43%4.41%6.91%
UNAVX
USA Mutuals All Seasons Fund		2.60%2.52%2.88%1.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.70%0.85%0.61%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

UNAVX and ABRZX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABRZX has higher volatility (3.22%) compared to UNAVX (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UNAVX dropped -30.05% vs ABRZX's -26.62%.

ABRZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UNAVX and ABRZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer