UMVP.TO vs. QMVP.TO
UMVP.TO (Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF) and QMVP.TO (Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UMVP.TO is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Solactive Canadian Utility Services High Dividend Index, while QMVP.TO is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
UMVP.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
UMVP.TO
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 4.40%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QMVP.TO
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 16.48%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UMVP.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
UMVP.TO Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF | 14.69% |
QMVP.TO Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF | 27.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between UMVP.TO and QMVP.TO is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | -0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UMVP.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF (UMVP.TO) and Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF (QMVP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UMVP.TO | QMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 5.03 | 4.30 | +0.72 |
Drawdowns
UMVP.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UMVP.TO drawdown since its inception was -4.57%, smaller than the maximum QMVP.TO drawdown of -12.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMVP.TO and QMVP.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UMVP.TO | QMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.57% | -12.77% | +8.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.96% | 0.00% | -0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.81% | -3.86% | +3.05% |
Volatility
UMVP.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UMVP.TO | QMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.11% | 21.70% | -12.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.11% | 21.70% | -12.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.11% | 21.70% | -12.59% |
Dividends
UMVP.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Dividend Comparison
UMVP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than QMVP.TO's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
QMVP.TO Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF | 0.19% |
UMVP.TO Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF | 1.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UMVP.TO and QMVP.TO have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UMVP.TO is categorized as Utilities Equities, while QMVP.TO is Technology Equities. UMVP.TO tracks Solactive Canadian Utility Services High Dividend Index, while QMVP.TO tracks Solactive Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index.
Find the right allocation for UMVP.TO and QMVP.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer