UMVP.TO vs. HFG.TO
UMVP.TO (Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF) and HFG.TO (Hamilton Global Financials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UMVP.TO is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Solactive Canadian Utility Services High Dividend Index, while HFG.TO is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Hamilton. UMVP.TO is passively managed, while HFG.TO is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
UMVP.TO vs. HFG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
UMVP.TO
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HFG.TO
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- 6M
- 6.75%
- YTD
- 7.82%
- 1Y
- 17.90%
- 3Y*
- 24.59%
- 5Y*
- 15.45%
- 10Y*
- —
UMVP.TO vs. HFG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
UMVP.TO Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF | 14.58% |
HFG.TO Hamilton Global Financials ETF | 8.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between UMVP.TO and HFG.TO is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2026 | -0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UMVP.TO vs. HFG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
UMVP.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HFG.TO
UMVP.TO vs. HFG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF (UMVP.TO) and Hamilton Global Financials ETF (HFG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UMVP.TO | HFG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.64 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.19 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UMVP.TO vs. HFG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UMVP.TO drawdown since its inception was -4.86%, smaller than the maximum HFG.TO drawdown of -42.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMVP.TO and HFG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UMVP.TO | HFG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.86% | -42.71% | +37.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -0.79% | -0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.08% | -5.37% | +4.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.46% | — |
Volatility
UMVP.TO vs. HFG.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UMVP.TO | HFG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.72% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.79% | 13.05% | -3.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.79% | 16.04% | -6.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.79% | 20.25% | -10.46% |
Dividends
UMVP.TO vs. HFG.TO - Dividend Comparison
UMVP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than HFG.TO's 2.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFG.TO Hamilton Global Financials ETF | 2.40% | 2.55% | 3.05% | 3.86% | 10.09% | 4.16% | 1.85% |
UMVP.TO Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF | 1.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UMVP.TO and HFG.TO have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UMVP.TO is categorized as Utilities Equities, while HFG.TO is Financials Equities.
Find the right allocation for UMVP.TO and HFG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer