PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UMNIX vs. BUBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UMNIX vs. BUBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio (UMNIX) and Baird Ultra Short Bond Fund Institutional Class (BUBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMNIX achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly lower than BUBIX's 1.17% return. Over the past 10 years, UMNIX has underperformed BUBIX with an annualized return of 1.76%, while BUBIX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.67% annualized return.


UMNIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
0.22%
6M
0.52%
1Y
2.56%
3Y*
3.80%
5Y*
1.87%
10Y*
1.76%

BUBIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.17%
6M
1.53%
1Y
3.93%
3Y*
4.99%
5Y*
3.58%
10Y*
2.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMNIX vs. BUBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UMNIX
Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio
0.22%5.02%3.88%3.53%-2.72%-0.44%2.47%3.26%1.09%0.82%
BUBIX
Baird Ultra Short Bond Fund Institutional Class
1.17%4.44%5.65%5.71%0.96%0.20%1.66%3.11%1.95%1.30%

Correlation

The correlation between UMNIX and BUBIX is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2014

0.19

The correlation between UMNIX and BUBIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UMNIX vs. BUBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMNIX
UMNIX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
UMNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
UMNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

BUBIX
BUBIX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BUBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BUBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMNIX vs. BUBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio (UMNIX) and Baird Ultra Short Bond Fund Institutional Class (BUBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UMNIXBUBIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-8.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

7.53

-6.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

13.32

-10.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.84

96.59

-86.75

UMNIX vs. BUBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMNIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is lower than the BUBIX Sharpe Ratio of 5.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMNIX and BUBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UMNIXBUBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

5.70

-3.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

4.53

-3.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.14

3.76

-2.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

3.43

-2.42

Drawdowns

UMNIX vs. BUBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMNIX drawdown since its inception was -4.13%, which is greater than BUBIX's maximum drawdown of -1.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMNIX and BUBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UMNIXBUBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-1.88%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.04%

-0.30%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.04%

-0.30%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.00%

-0.68%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-4.13%

-1.88%

-2.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

0.00%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.85%

-0.05%

-0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.32%

0.04%

+0.28%

Volatility

UMNIX vs. BUBIX - Volatility Comparison

Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio (UMNIX) has a higher volatility of 0.53% compared to Baird Ultra Short Bond Fund Institutional Class (BUBIX) at 0.14%. This indicates that UMNIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UMNIXBUBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.53%

0.14%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.15%

0.51%

+0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78%

0.70%

+1.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.96%

0.79%

+1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.54%

0.71%

+0.83%

UMNIX vs. BUBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMNIX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BUBIX's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

UMNIX vs. BUBIX - Dividend Comparison

UMNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, less than BUBIX's 3.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUBIX
Baird Ultra Short Bond Fund Institutional Class
3.96%4.16%5.31%4.65%1.56%0.50%1.44%2.57%2.13%1.29%1.04%0.80%
UMNIX
Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio
2.96%3.94%3.48%2.70%1.30%0.16%1.22%2.48%2.00%1.53%1.30%1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


UMNIX and BUBIX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UMNIX has higher volatility (0.53%) compared to BUBIX (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMNIX dropped -4.13% vs BUBIX's -1.88%.

BUBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.70 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UMNIX and BUBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer