UMMGX vs. GBIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Bond Fund (UMMGX) and Nationwide Bond Index Fund (GBIAX).
UMMGX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Jan 9, 1986. GBIAX is managed by Nationwide. It was launched on Dec 29, 1999.
Performance
UMMGX vs. GBIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UMMGX vs. GBIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMMGX Columbia Bond Fund | 0.03% | 8.03% | 2.06% | 6.73% | -15.66% | -0.79% | 9.10% | 9.23% | -0.50% | 3.73% |
GBIAX Nationwide Bond Index Fund | -0.40% | 6.54% | 0.44% | 5.03% | -14.06% | -2.38% | 6.60% | 8.08% | -0.74% | 2.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UMMGX achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly higher than GBIAX's -0.40% return. Over the past 10 years, UMMGX has outperformed GBIAX with an annualized return of 2.07%, while GBIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.91% annualized return.
UMMGX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- YTD
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 0.77%
- 1Y
- 4.54%
- 3Y*
- 4.20%
- 5Y*
- 0.12%
- 10Y*
- 2.07%
GBIAX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- -0.40%
- 6M
- 0.20%
- 1Y
- 3.11%
- 3Y*
- 2.83%
- 5Y*
- -0.58%
- 10Y*
- 0.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UMMGX vs. GBIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UMMGX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than GBIAX's 0.64% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UMMGX vs. GBIAX — Risk / Return Rank
UMMGX
GBIAX
UMMGX vs. GBIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Bond Fund (UMMGX) and Nationwide Bond Index Fund (GBIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UMMGX | GBIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.31 | 0.77 | +0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.95 | 1.10 | +0.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.14 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 1.40 | +0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.63 | 3.85 | +2.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UMMGX | GBIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 0.77 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | -0.10 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.18 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.73 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between UMMGX and GBIAX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
UMMGX vs. GBIAX - Dividend Comparison
UMMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, more than GBIAX's 2.97% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMMGX Columbia Bond Fund | 4.08% | 4.20% | 3.70% | 3.73% | 2.73% | 1.76% | 4.77% | 4.21% | 2.71% | 1.88% | 4.66% | 3.56% |
GBIAX Nationwide Bond Index Fund | 2.97% | 3.18% | 3.07% | 2.57% | 1.59% | 3.02% | 1.79% | 2.27% | 2.29% | 1.93% | 2.15% | 2.43% |
Drawdowns
UMMGX vs. GBIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UMMGX drawdown since its inception was -20.86%, roughly equal to the maximum GBIAX drawdown of -20.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMMGX and GBIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UMMGX | GBIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.86% | -20.26% | -0.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.76% | -2.73% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.86% | -19.07% | -1.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.86% | -20.26% | -0.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.58% | -6.78% | +4.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.73% | -3.02% | +0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | 0.99% | -0.12% |
Volatility
UMMGX vs. GBIAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Bond Fund (UMMGX) is 1.05%, while Nationwide Bond Index Fund (GBIAX) has a volatility of 1.54%. This indicates that UMMGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GBIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UMMGX | GBIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.05% | 1.54% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.35% | 2.62% | -0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.43% | 4.36% | +0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.31% | 5.98% | +0.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.18% | 4.94% | +0.24% |