UMLGX vs. VRGWX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

UMLGX (Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Fund) and VRGWX (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, UMLGX returned 11.92%/yr vs 17.69%/yr for VRGWX. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. UMLGX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VRGWX.

Performance

UMLGX vs. VRGWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Fund (UMLGX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMLGX achieves a 5.95% return, which is significantly higher than VRGWX's -0.51% return. Over the past 10 years, UMLGX has underperformed VRGWX with an annualized return of 11.92%, while VRGWX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.69% annualized return.

UMLGX

• 1D: 3.17%
• 1M: -2.09%
• 6M: 8.41%
• YTD: 5.95%
• 1Y: 8.82%
• 3Y*: 13.58%
• 5Y*: 4.38%
• 10Y*: 11.92%
• ALL TIME*: 8.50%

VRGWX

• 1D: 2.96%
• 1M: -3.22%
• 6M: 1.02%
• YTD: -0.51%
• 1Y: 9.23%
• 3Y*: 18.85%
• 5Y*: 12.46%
• 10Y*: 17.69%
• ALL TIME*: 16.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
UMLGX Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
VRGWX Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

UMLGX vs. VRGWX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UMLGX Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Fund	5.95%	10.64%	15.91%	39.46%	-32.52%	9.30%	47.97%	38.23%	-12.56%	35.45%
VRGWX Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares	-0.51%	18.32%	33.25%	42.65%	-29.18%	32.42%	38.38%	36.30%	-1.59%	30.11%

Correlation

The correlation between UMLGX and VRGWX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010	0.92

The correlation between UMLGX and VRGWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

UMLGX vs. VRGWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UMLGX

UMLGX Risk / Return Rank: 9
UMLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
UMLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
UMLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
UMLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
UMLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

VRGWX

VRGWX Risk / Return Rank: 11
VRGWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
VRGWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
VRGWX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
VRGWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
VRGWX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UMLGX vs. VRGWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Fund (UMLGX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UMLGX	VRGWX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.37	0.41	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.63	0.69	-0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.08	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.40	0.45	-0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.18	1.34	-0.16

UMLGX vs. VRGWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMLGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is comparable to the VRGWX Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMLGX and VRGWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UMLGX vs. VRGWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMLGX drawdown since its inception was -73.05%, which is greater than VRGWX's maximum drawdown of -32.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMLGX and VRGWX.

Drawdown Indicators

	UMLGX	VRGWX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.05%	-32.70%	-40.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.42%	-16.19%	-0.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.90%	-23.44%	-0.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.79%	-32.70%	-11.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.79%	-32.70%	-11.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.91%	-8.72%	+2.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.53%	-4.88%	-21.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.63%	5.38%	+0.25%

Volatility

UMLGX vs. VRGWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Fund (UMLGX) is 5.88%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX) has a volatility of 6.40%. This indicates that UMLGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRGWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UMLGX	VRGWX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.88%	6.40%	-0.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.78%	14.06%	+0.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.87%	17.50%	+0.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.93%	21.94%	+1.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.60%	21.29%	+2.31%

UMLGX vs. VRGWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMLGX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than VRGWX's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

UMLGX vs. VRGWX - Dividend Comparison

UMLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.29%, more than VRGWX's 0.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
UMLGX Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Fund	12.29%	35.72%	18.08%	11.04%	14.23%	35.11%	24.47%	33.49%	13.61%	11.08%	13.27%	14.17%
VRGWX Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares	0.49%	0.35%	0.56%	0.71%	0.99%	4.18%	0.77%	1.03%	1.22%	1.22%	1.52%	1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UMLGX and VRGWX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, UMLGX and VRGWX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, UMLGX or VRGWX?

VRGWX has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to UMLGX (5.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMLGX dropped -73.05% vs VRGWX's -32.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VRGWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.41 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.