PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
UMI.BR vs. FQT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

UMI.BR vs. FQT.DE

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

UMI.BR (Umicore SA) and FQT.DE (Frequentis AG) are both stocks. UMI.BR operates in Pollution & Treatment Controls (Industrials), while FQT.DE operates in Communication Equipment (Technology). Over the past 5 years, UMI.BR returned -11.72%/yr vs 25.86%/yr for FQT.DE. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

UMI.BR vs. FQT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Umicore SA (UMI.BR) and Frequentis AG (FQT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMI.BR achieves a 30.90% return, which is significantly higher than FQT.DE's 5.91% return.

UMI.BR

1D
-0.95%
1M
4.67%
YTD
30.90%
6M
50.01%
1Y
127.93%
3Y*
-2.53%
5Y*
-11.72%
10Y*
2.60%

FQT.DE

1D
0.26%
1M
-2.90%
YTD
5.91%
6M
10.78%
1Y
63.56%
3Y*
37.14%
5Y*
25.86%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMI.BR vs. FQT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
UMI.BR
Umicore SA		30.90%85.26%-58.27%-25.60%-1.84%-7.70%-8.80%46.61%
FQT.DE
Frequentis AG		5.91%172.13%-0.66%-3.80%7.41%48.15%-9.09%12.82%

Correlation

The correlation between UMI.BR and FQT.DE is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2019

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Umicore SA

Frequentis AG

Often compared with UMI.BR:
UMI.BR vs. SMHUMI.BR vs. SBSWUMI.BR vs. ILU.AXUMI.BR vs. NDA.DEUMI.BR vs. AMG.ASUMI.BR vs. PZAKYUMI.BR vs. IDR.MC
Often compared with FQT.DE:
FQT.DE vs. SSUN.FFQT.DE vs. PDDFQT.DE vs. 0014.HKFQT.DE vs. ACOMO.ASFQT.DE vs. AUCO.LFQT.DE vs. PZAKYFQT.DE vs. MSTR

Return for Risk

UMI.BR vs. FQT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
UMI.BR
UMI.BR Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
UMI.BR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMI.BR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMI.BR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
UMI.BR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMI.BR Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
FQT.DE
FQT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FQT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FQT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMI.BR vs. FQT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Umicore SA (UMI.BR) and Frequentis AG (FQT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

UMI.BRFQT.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.56
1.10

+1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.42
1.71

+1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.21

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.41

2.07

+2.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.61

4.13

+6.48

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UMI.BR vs. FQT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMI.BR Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the FQT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMI.BR and FQT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

UMI.BRFQT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

1.10

+1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

0.68

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.67

-0.45

Drawdowns

UMI.BR vs. FQT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMI.BR drawdown since its inception was -86.39%, which is greater than FQT.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMI.BR and FQT.DE.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

UMI.BRFQT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.39%

-33.89%

-52.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.72%

-30.60%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.99%

-30.60%

-41.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.39%

-32.34%

-54.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.39%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.77%

-14.52%

-41.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.31%

-11.53%

-14.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.00%

15.34%

-3.34%

Volatility

UMI.BR vs. FQT.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Umicore SA (UMI.BR) is 20.30%, while Frequentis AG (FQT.DE) has a volatility of 21.71%. This indicates that UMI.BR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

UMI.BRFQT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.30%

21.71%

-1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.91%

38.07%

-2.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.55%

57.61%

-8.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.73%

37.42%

+1.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.40%

35.06%

+1.34%

Dividends

UMI.BR vs. FQT.DE - Dividend Comparison

UMI.BR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than FQT.DE's 0.35% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FQT.DE
Frequentis AG		0.35%0.37%0.89%0.81%0.70%0.56%0.82%0.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UMI.BR
Umicore SA		2.19%1.40%6.92%2.77%2.33%2.10%0.64%1.79%2.08%2.48%4.80%5.17%

Financials

UMI.BR vs. FQT.DE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Umicore SA and Frequentis AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions

UMI.BR and FQT.DE have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UMI.BR and FQT.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer