PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
UMBF vs. CFB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

UMBF vs. CFB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) and CrossFirst Bankshares, Inc. (CFB).

Performance

UMBF vs. CFB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) and CrossFirst Bankshares, Inc. (CFB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UMBF vs. CFB - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)
UMBF
UMB Financial Corporation		-15.71%
CFB
CrossFirst Bankshares, Inc.		0.00%

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

UMBF:

$4.25B

CFB:

$442.62M

Gross Profit (TTM)

UMBF:

$1.70B

CFB:

$442.62M

EBITDA (TTM)

UMBF:

$739.37M

CFB:

$80.17M

Returns By Period

UMBF

1D
2.56%
1M
-2.30%
YTD
-1.58%
6M
-3.97%
1Y
13.21%
3Y*
27.21%
5Y*
5.81%
10Y*
9.92%

CFB

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

UMB Financial Corporation

CrossFirst Bankshares, Inc.

Often compared with UMBF:
UMBF vs. SPYUMBF vs. TMUSUMBF vs. RFUMBF vs. AMUMBF vs. ZYME

Return for Risk

UMBF vs. CFB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
UMBF
UMBF Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
UMBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMBF Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
UMBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMBF Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
CFB
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMBF vs. CFB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) and CrossFirst Bankshares, Inc. (CFB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

UMBFCFBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.41

—

—

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.76

—

—

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

—

—

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

—

—

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.75

—

—

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UMBF vs. CFB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

UMBFCFBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

—

—

Dividends

UMBF vs. CFB - Dividend Comparison

UMBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, while CFB has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UMBF
UMB Financial Corporation		1.47%1.42%1.39%1.83%1.78%1.30%1.81%1.76%1.92%1.45%1.28%2.04%
CFB
CrossFirst Bankshares, Inc.		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

UMBF vs. CFB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMBF drawdown since its inception was -52.70%, which is greater than CFB's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMBF and CFB.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

UMBFCFBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.70%

0.00%

-52.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.57%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.25%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.25%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.71%

0.00%

-15.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.83%

0.00%

-17.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.12%

—

—

Volatility

UMBF vs. CFB - Volatility Comparison

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

UMBFCFBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.44%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.02%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.15%

0.00%

+32.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.37%

0.00%

+33.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.54%

0.00%

+33.54%

Financials

UMBF vs. CFB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between UMB Financial Corporation and CrossFirst Bankshares, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

0.00500.00M1.00B1.50BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
886.88M
67.13M
(UMBF) Total Revenue
(CFB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items