PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UMBF vs. CFB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UMBF vs. CFB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) and CrossFirst Bankshares, Inc. (CFB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


UMBF

1D
-2.20%
1M
-2.36%
YTD
10.25%
6M
10.70%
1Y
23.82%
3Y*
27.92%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*
10.03%

CFB

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMBF vs. CFB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

UMBF:

$4.46B

CFB:

$442.62M

Gross Profit (TTM)

UMBF:

$1.99B

CFB:

$442.62M

EBITDA (TTM)

UMBF:

$937.72M

CFB:

$80.17M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UMBF vs. CFB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMBF
UMBF Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
UMBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMBF Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
UMBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMBF Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

CFB
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMBF vs. CFB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) and CrossFirst Bankshares, Inc. (CFB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UMBFCFBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.96

UMBF vs. CFB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UMBFCFBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

Drawdowns

UMBF vs. CFB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMBF drawdown since its inception was -52.70%, which is greater than CFB's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMBF and CFB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UMBFCFBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.70%

0.00%

-52.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.98%

0.00%

-5.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.77%

0.00%

-17.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.06%

Volatility

UMBF vs. CFB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UMBFCFBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.03%

0.00%

+27.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.31%

0.00%

+33.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.52%

0.00%

+33.52%

Dividends

UMBF vs. CFB - Dividend Comparison

UMBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, while CFB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CFB
CrossFirst Bankshares, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UMBF
UMB Financial Corporation
1.31%1.42%1.39%1.83%1.78%1.30%1.81%1.76%1.92%1.45%1.28%2.04%

Financials

UMBF vs. CFB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between UMB Financial Corporation and CrossFirst Bankshares, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
867.07M
67.13M
(UMBF) Total Revenue
(CFB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items
Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UMBF and CFB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer