PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
UMAX.AX vs. QOZ.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

UMAX.AX vs. QOZ.AX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

UMAX.AX (Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF) and QOZ.AX (BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UMAX.AX is a Global Equities fund actively managed by BetaShares, while QOZ.AX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Australia 200 Index. UMAX.AX is actively managed, while QOZ.AX is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UMAX.AX returned 9.79%/yr vs 8.91%/yr for QOZ.AX. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

UMAX.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF (UMAX.AX) and BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF (QOZ.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMAX.AX achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly lower than QOZ.AX's 5.36% return. Over the past 10 years, UMAX.AX has outperformed QOZ.AX with an annualized return of 9.79%, while QOZ.AX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.91% annualized return.

UMAX.AX

1D
0.11%
1M
2.86%
6M
1.19%
YTD
0.67%
1Y
9.16%
3Y*
12.47%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*
9.79%

QOZ.AX

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.89%
6M
4.91%
YTD
5.36%
1Y
14.79%
3Y*
11.72%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
8.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMAX.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UMAX.AX
Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF		0.67%4.00%31.81%15.37%-9.29%29.75%-6.67%22.95%2.49%5.84%
QOZ.AX
BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF		5.36%14.57%8.09%8.49%3.17%17.17%-0.13%18.60%-5.96%9.73%

Correlation

The correlation between UMAX.AX and QOZ.AX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2014

0.33

The correlation between UMAX.AX and QOZ.AX shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (3 years) to 0.35 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF

BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF

Often compared with QOZ.AX:
QOZ.AX vs. A200.AXQOZ.AX vs. DHHF.AXQOZ.AX vs. TRET.LQOZ.AX vs. NDQ.AXQOZ.AX vs. ARMR.AXQOZ.AX vs. TRET.DE

Return for Risk

UMAX.AX vs. QOZ.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
UMAX.AX
UMAX.AX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
UMAX.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMAX.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMAX.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
UMAX.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMAX.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
QOZ.AX
QOZ.AX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
QOZ.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QOZ.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
QOZ.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
QOZ.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
QOZ.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMAX.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF (UMAX.AX) and BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF (QOZ.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

UMAX.AXQOZ.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.86
1.32

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.21
1.85

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.23

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

1.82

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.77

4.58

-2.81

UMAX.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMAX.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the QOZ.AX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMAX.AX and QOZ.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UMAX.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMAX.AX drawdown since its inception was -24.10%, smaller than the maximum QOZ.AX drawdown of -37.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMAX.AX and QOZ.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

UMAX.AXQOZ.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.10%

-37.05%

+12.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.14%

-8.60%

-2.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.42%

-13.67%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.14%

-14.87%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.10%

-37.05%

+12.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-3.17%

+2.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.15%

-4.61%

-0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.86%

3.44%

+1.42%

Volatility

UMAX.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Volatility Comparison

Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF (UMAX.AX) has a higher volatility of 2.82% compared to BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF (QOZ.AX) at 2.43%. This indicates that UMAX.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QOZ.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

UMAX.AXQOZ.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

2.43%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.85%

9.38%

-1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.88%

11.91%

-2.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.92%

12.87%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.41%

14.67%

-1.26%

Dividends

UMAX.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Dividend Comparison

UMAX.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than QOZ.AX's 2.26% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QOZ.AX
BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF		2.26%2.07%2.42%2.75%4.97%3.96%3.30%6.45%4.28%1.82%3.62%6.33%
UMAX.AX
Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF		3.12%5.33%2.19%4.02%5.79%5.05%7.02%5.43%4.06%3.16%4.12%4.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

UMAX.AX and QOZ.AX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UMAX.AX is categorized as Global Equities, while QOZ.AX is Large Cap Value Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UMAX.AX and QOZ.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer