PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
UMAX.AX vs. IAA.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

UMAX.AX vs. IAA.AX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

UMAX.AX (Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF) and IAA.AX (iShares Asia 50 ETF (AU)) are both Global Equities funds. UMAX.AX is actively managed, while IAA.AX is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UMAX.AX returned 9.79%/yr vs 14.57%/yr for IAA.AX. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

UMAX.AX vs. IAA.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF (UMAX.AX) and iShares Asia 50 ETF (AU) (IAA.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMAX.AX achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly lower than IAA.AX's 35.14% return. Over the past 10 years, UMAX.AX has underperformed IAA.AX with an annualized return of 9.79%, while IAA.AX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.57% annualized return.

UMAX.AX

1D
0.11%
1M
2.86%
6M
1.19%
YTD
0.67%
1Y
9.16%
3Y*
12.47%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*
9.79%

IAA.AX

1D
-2.18%
1M
-4.08%
6M
25.27%
YTD
35.14%
1Y
61.40%
3Y*
31.17%
5Y*
12.29%
10Y*
14.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMAX.AX vs. IAA.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UMAX.AX
Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF		0.67%4.00%31.81%15.37%-9.29%29.75%-6.67%22.95%2.49%5.84%
IAA.AX
iShares Asia 50 ETF (AU)		35.14%36.38%29.68%1.92%-17.59%-5.27%22.79%22.16%-4.60%34.31%

Correlation

The correlation between UMAX.AX and IAA.AX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2014

0.37

The correlation between UMAX.AX and IAA.AX shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (3 years) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF

iShares Asia 50 ETF (AU)

Return for Risk

UMAX.AX vs. IAA.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
UMAX.AX
UMAX.AX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
UMAX.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMAX.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMAX.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
UMAX.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMAX.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
IAA.AX
IAA.AX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IAA.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAA.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAA.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
IAA.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAA.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMAX.AX vs. IAA.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF (UMAX.AX) and iShares Asia 50 ETF (AU) (IAA.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

UMAX.AXIAA.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.86
2.19

-1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.21
2.67

-1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.37

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

4.70

-3.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.77

14.14

-12.38

UMAX.AX vs. IAA.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMAX.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the IAA.AX Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMAX.AX and IAA.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UMAX.AX vs. IAA.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMAX.AX drawdown since its inception was -24.10%, smaller than the maximum IAA.AX drawdown of -44.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMAX.AX and IAA.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

UMAX.AXIAA.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.10%

-44.90%

+20.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.14%

-12.04%

+0.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.42%

-17.55%

+2.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.14%

-40.25%

+23.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.10%

-44.90%

+20.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-8.78%

+8.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.15%

-10.35%

+5.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.86%

4.08%

+0.78%

Volatility

UMAX.AX vs. IAA.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF (UMAX.AX) is 2.82%, while iShares Asia 50 ETF (AU) (IAA.AX) has a volatility of 13.74%. This indicates that UMAX.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAA.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

UMAX.AXIAA.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

13.74%

-10.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.85%

23.51%

-15.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.88%

25.84%

-15.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.92%

22.05%

-9.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.41%

19.33%

-5.92%

Dividends

UMAX.AX vs. IAA.AX - Dividend Comparison

UMAX.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than IAA.AX's 1.00% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAA.AX
iShares Asia 50 ETF (AU)		1.00%2.16%0.44%1.36%3.40%1.68%1.18%4.31%0.48%1.28%1.78%0.00%
UMAX.AX
Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF		3.12%5.33%2.19%4.02%5.79%5.05%7.02%5.43%4.06%3.16%4.12%4.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

UMAX.AX and IAA.AX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: BetaShares and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UMAX.AX and IAA.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer