PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ULTY vs. QDTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ULTY vs. QDTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY) and YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ULTY achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly lower than QDTY's 12.10% return.


ULTY

1D
0.94%
1M
-1.19%
YTD
7.39%
6M
5.32%
1Y
4.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QDTY

1D
1.83%
1M
1.96%
YTD
12.10%
6M
11.87%
1Y
33.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ULTY vs. QDTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ULTY and QDTY is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025

0.73

The correlation between ULTY and QDTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

ULTY vs. QDTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ULTY
QDTY

Technology

54.6%
53.7%

Basic Materials

11.7%
1.1%

Industrials

9.3%
3.1%

Communication Services

8.9%
15.8%

Financial Services

8.6%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
12.2%

Healthcare

1.8%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Technology

ULTY
54.6%
QDTY
53.7%

Basic Materials

ULTY
11.7%
QDTY
1.1%

Industrials

ULTY
9.3%
QDTY
3.1%

Communication Services

ULTY
8.9%
QDTY
15.8%

Financial Services

ULTY
8.6%
QDTY
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ULTY
5.2%
QDTY
12.2%

Healthcare

ULTY
1.8%
QDTY
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

ULTY
0.0%
QDTY
7.7%

Energy

ULTY

-

QDTY
0.6%

Real Estate

ULTY

-

QDTY
0.1%

Utilities

ULTY

-

QDTY
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ULTY vs. QDTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ULTY
ULTY Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
ULTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULTY Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
ULTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULTY Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

QDTY
QDTY Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
QDTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDTY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QDTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDTY Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ULTY vs. QDTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY) and YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ULTYQDTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.38

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.17

3.05

-2.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.34

11.07

-10.73

ULTY vs. QDTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ULTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the QDTY Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULTY and QDTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ULTYQDTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

2.12

-1.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.71

-0.60

Drawdowns

ULTY vs. QDTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ULTY drawdown since its inception was -26.85%, which is greater than QDTY's maximum drawdown of -23.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULTY and QDTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ULTYQDTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.85%

-23.45%

-3.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.16%

-11.10%

-13.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.95%

-3.67%

-8.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.38%

-4.47%

-4.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.37%

3.05%

+9.32%

Volatility

ULTY vs. QDTY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) at 6.26%. This indicates that ULTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ULTYQDTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.96%

6.26%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.88%

12.86%

+3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.21%

16.00%

+5.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.07%

26.13%

+0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.07%

26.13%

+0.94%

ULTY vs. QDTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

ULTY has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than QDTY's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

ULTY vs. QDTY - Dividend Comparison

ULTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 115.53%, more than QDTY's 31.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
QDTY
YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
31.52%26.82%0.00%
ULTY
YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF
115.53%142.99%111.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


ULTY and QDTY have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ULTY has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to QDTY (6.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULTY dropped -26.85% vs QDTY's -23.45%.

On 1-year performance, QDTY leads with 33.68% vs 4.18% for ULTY. On fees, QDTY is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, QDTY has been the lower-risk option at 6.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QDTY has performed better with a 33.68% return vs 4.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QDTY is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for ULTY.

ULTY has the higher dividend yield at 115.53%, compared with 31.52% for QDTY.

ULTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while QDTY is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for ULTY and 1.01% for QDTY.

QDTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ULTY and QDTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer