ULTY vs. QDTY
ULTY (YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF) and QDTY (YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ULTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while QDTY is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ULTY returned 4.18% vs 33.68% for QDTY. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ULTY charges 1.14%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for QDTY.
Performance
ULTY vs. QDTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ULTY achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly lower than QDTY's 12.10% return.
ULTY
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -1.19%
- YTD
- 7.39%
- 6M
- 5.32%
- 1Y
- 4.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDTY
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- 12.10%
- 6M
- 11.87%
- 1Y
- 33.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ULTY vs. QDTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ULTY YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF | 7.39% | -4.83% |
QDTY YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 12.10% | 12.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between ULTY and QDTY is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025 | 0.73 |
The correlation between ULTY and QDTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
ULTY vs. QDTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ULTY
QDTY
Technology
Basic Materials
Industrials
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
ULTY
QDTY
Basic Materials
ULTY
QDTY
Industrials
ULTY
QDTY
Communication Services
ULTY
QDTY
Financial Services
ULTY
QDTY
Consumer Cyclical
ULTY
QDTY
Healthcare
ULTY
QDTY
Consumer Defensive
ULTY
QDTY
Energy
ULTY
-
QDTY
Real Estate
ULTY
-
QDTY
Utilities
ULTY
-
QDTY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ULTY vs. QDTY — Risk / Return Rank
ULTY
QDTY
ULTY vs. QDTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY) and YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ULTY | QDTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.38 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | 3.05 | -2.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.34 | 11.07 | -10.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ULTY | QDTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 | 2.12 | -1.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.71 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
ULTY vs. QDTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ULTY drawdown since its inception was -26.85%, which is greater than QDTY's maximum drawdown of -23.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULTY and QDTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ULTY | QDTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.85% | -23.45% | -3.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.16% | -11.10% | -13.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.95% | -3.67% | -8.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.38% | -4.47% | -4.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.37% | 3.05% | +9.32% |
Volatility
ULTY vs. QDTY - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) at 6.26%. This indicates that ULTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ULTY | QDTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.96% | 6.26% | +0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.88% | 12.86% | +3.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.21% | 16.00% | +5.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.07% | 26.13% | +0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.07% | 26.13% | +0.94% |
ULTY vs. QDTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ULTY has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than QDTY's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
ULTY vs. QDTY - Dividend Comparison
ULTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 115.53%, more than QDTY's 31.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QDTY YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 31.52% | 26.82% | 0.00% |
ULTY YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF | 115.53% | 142.99% | 111.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ULTY and QDTY have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ULTY has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to QDTY (6.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULTY dropped -26.85% vs QDTY's -23.45%.
On 1-year performance, QDTY leads with 33.68% vs 4.18% for ULTY. On fees, QDTY is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, QDTY has been the lower-risk option at 6.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QDTY has performed better with a 33.68% return vs 4.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QDTY is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for ULTY.
ULTY has the higher dividend yield at 115.53%, compared with 31.52% for QDTY.
ULTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while QDTY is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for ULTY and 1.01% for QDTY.
QDTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ULTY and QDTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer