ULTY vs. FEAT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

ULTY (YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF) and FEAT (YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. ULTY is actively managed, while FEAT is passively managed. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ULTY charges 1.40%/yr vs 1.28%/yr for FEAT.

Performance

ULTY vs. FEAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY) and YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ULTY

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: -3.39%
• 6M: 1.20%
• YTD: 2.90%
• 1Y: -9.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -1.16%

FEAT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ULTY YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF	$16.46M	$14.74M	$17.73M

ULTY vs. FEAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ULTY YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF	2.90%	-0.84%	-5.08%
FEAT YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF	-6.78%	-4.21%	-9.44%

Correlation

The correlation between ULTY and FEAT is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2024	0.73

The correlation between ULTY and FEAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ULTY vs. FEAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ULTY

ULTY Risk / Return Rank: 5
ULTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
ULTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
ULTY Omega Ratio Rank: 5
ULTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
ULTY Martin Ratio Rank: 5

FEAT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ULTY vs. FEAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY) and YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ULTY	FEAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.52	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.57	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.47	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.86	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ULTY	FEAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.63%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.03%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.27%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ULTY	FEAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.71%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.07%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.12%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.08%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.08%	—	—

ULTY vs. FEAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ULTY has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FEAT's 1.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

ULTY vs. FEAT - Dividend Comparison

ULTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 113.74%, while FEAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FEAT YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF	77.86%	76.35%	0.00%
ULTY YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF	113.74%	142.99%	111.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ULTY and FEAT in my portfolio?

ULTY and FEAT have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ULTY or FEAT?

On fees, FEAT is cheaper at 1.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ULTY or FEAT?

FEAT is cheaper with a 1.28% expense ratio, compared with 1.40% for ULTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ULTY or FEAT?

ULTY has the higher dividend yield at 113.74%, compared with 77.86% for FEAT.

What is the main difference between ULTY and FEAT?

Their fees differ too: 1.40% for ULTY and 1.28% for FEAT.