ULTY vs. AAPW

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

ULTY (YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF) and AAPW (AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ULTY returned 4.18% vs 53.40% for AAPW. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ULTY charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AAPW.

Performance

ULTY vs. AAPW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY) and AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF (AAPW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ULTY achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly lower than AAPW's 11.28% return.

ULTY

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: -1.19%
• YTD: 7.39%
• 6M: 5.32%
• 1Y: 4.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AAPW

• 1D: -2.57%
• 1M: 3.24%
• YTD: 11.28%
• 6M: 8.38%
• 1Y: 53.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ULTY vs. AAPW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ULTY YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF	7.39%	-6.76%
AAPW AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF	11.28%	8.71%

Correlation

The correlation between ULTY and AAPW is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025	0.34

ULTY vs. AAPW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ULTY	AAPW
Technology	54.6%	19.9%
Basic Materials	11.7%	-
Industrials	9.3%	-
Communication Services	8.9%	-
Financial Services	8.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	5.2%	-
Healthcare	1.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ULTY vs. AAPW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ULTY

ULTY Risk / Return Rank: 12
ULTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
ULTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
ULTY Omega Ratio Rank: 12
ULTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
ULTY Martin Ratio Rank: 11

AAPW

AAPW Risk / Return Rank: 63
AAPW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
AAPW Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
AAPW Omega Ratio Rank: 64
AAPW Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
AAPW Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ULTY vs. AAPW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY) and AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF (AAPW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ULTY	AAPW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.20	1.94	-1.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.40	2.75	-2.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.35	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.17	3.09	-2.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.34	7.76	-7.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ULTY vs. AAPW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ULTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the AAPW Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULTY and AAPW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ULTY	AAPW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20	1.94	-1.75
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.11	0.45	-0.34

Drawdowns

ULTY vs. AAPW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ULTY drawdown since its inception was -26.85%, smaller than the maximum AAPW drawdown of -36.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULTY and AAPW.

Drawdown Indicators

	ULTY	AAPW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.85%	-36.28%	+9.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.16%	-17.36%	-6.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.95%	-5.19%	-6.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.38%	-11.10%	+1.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.37%	6.92%	+5.45%

Volatility

ULTY vs. AAPW - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY) and AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF (AAPW) have volatilities of 6.96% and 6.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ULTY	AAPW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.96%	6.96%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.88%	19.70%	-3.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.21%	27.65%	-6.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.07%	34.66%	-7.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.07%	34.66%	-7.59%

ULTY vs. AAPW - Expense Ratio Comparison

ULTY has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than AAPW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

ULTY vs. AAPW - Dividend Comparison

ULTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 115.53%, more than AAPW's 33.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AAPW AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF	33.19%	28.83%	0.00%
ULTY YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF	115.53%	142.99%	111.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ULTY and AAPW in my portfolio?

ULTY and AAPW have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ULTY or AAPW?

AAPW has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to ULTY (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULTY dropped -26.85% vs AAPW's -36.28%.

Which ETF is better, ULTY or AAPW?

On 1-year performance, AAPW leads with 53.40% vs 4.18% for ULTY. On fees, AAPW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ULTY or AAPW?

Over the 1-year period, AAPW has performed better with a 53.40% return vs 4.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ULTY or AAPW?

AAPW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for ULTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ULTY or AAPW?

ULTY has the higher dividend yield at 115.53%, compared with 33.19% for AAPW.

What is the main difference between ULTY and AAPW?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for ULTY and 0.99% for AAPW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAPW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.