PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
UKCO.L vs. ACWI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

UKCO.L vs. ACWI.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UKCO.L (SPDR Bloomberg Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) and ACWI.L (SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UKCO.L is a European Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts TR, while ACWI.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UKCO.L returned 1.34%/yr vs 13.49%/yr for ACWI.L. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UKCO.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for ACWI.L.

Performance

UKCO.L vs. ACWI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (UKCO.L) and SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UKCO.L achieves a -2.41% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI.L's 11.83% return. Over the past 10 years, UKCO.L has underperformed ACWI.L with an annualized return of 1.34%, while ACWI.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.49% annualized return.

UKCO.L

1D
0.32%
1M
1.04%
YTD
-2.41%
6M
-1.98%
1Y
-0.03%
3Y*
4.33%
5Y*
-1.76%
10Y*
1.34%

ACWI.L

1D
-0.04%
1M
3.77%
YTD
11.83%
6M
11.80%
1Y
30.06%
3Y*
18.14%
5Y*
12.52%
10Y*
13.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UKCO.L vs. ACWI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UKCO.L
SPDR Bloomberg Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF		-2.41%4.42%1.65%8.85%-19.34%-3.36%8.76%11.28%-2.44%4.28%
ACWI.L
SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF		11.83%14.32%19.66%15.59%-8.59%20.28%11.89%21.92%-4.58%12.93%

Correlation

The correlation between UKCO.L and ACWI.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2012

0.04

Over the past year, UKCO.L and ACWI.L have become more correlated (0.28) than their long-term average of 0.04, meaning their price movements have been converging.

UKCO.L vs. ACWI.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
UKCO.L
ACWI.L

Financial Services

25.2%
16.5%

Communication Services

5.2%
9.0%

Real Estate

3.7%
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
4.9%

Utilities

2.4%
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

2.0%
9.3%

Healthcare

1.8%
8.0%

Industrials

1.7%
10.9%

Technology

0.7%
29.2%

Basic Materials

0.7%
3.6%

Energy

0.1%
4.3%

Financial Services

UKCO.L
25.2%
ACWI.L
16.5%

Communication Services

UKCO.L
5.2%
ACWI.L
9.0%

Real Estate

UKCO.L
3.7%
ACWI.L
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

UKCO.L
2.4%
ACWI.L
4.9%

Utilities

UKCO.L
2.4%
ACWI.L
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

UKCO.L
2.0%
ACWI.L
9.3%

Healthcare

UKCO.L
1.8%
ACWI.L
8.0%

Industrials

UKCO.L
1.7%
ACWI.L
10.9%

Technology

UKCO.L
0.7%
ACWI.L
29.2%

Basic Materials

UKCO.L
0.7%
ACWI.L
3.6%

Energy

UKCO.L
0.1%
ACWI.L
4.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SPDR Bloomberg Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF

SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF

Often compared with UKCO.L:
UKCO.L vs. CSH2.LUKCO.L vs. EUCO.LUKCO.L vs. IS15.LUKCO.L vs. IBCX.LUKCO.L vs. XBLC.LUKCO.L vs. VECA.LUKCO.L vs. IEAA.L
Often compared with ACWI.L:
ACWI.L vs. VWCE.DEACWI.L vs. ACWIACWI.L vs. IWDA.LACWI.L vs. SPYACWI.L vs. SSAC.LACWI.L vs. CSPX.ASACWI.L vs. IMID.L

Return for Risk

UKCO.L vs. ACWI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
UKCO.L
UKCO.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
UKCO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UKCO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
UKCO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
UKCO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
UKCO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
ACWI.L
ACWI.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ACWI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UKCO.L vs. ACWI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (UKCO.L) and SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

UKCO.LACWI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.01
2.89

-2.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.03
3.99

-3.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.55

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.01

4.28

-4.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.02

17.31

-17.33

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UKCO.L vs. ACWI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UKCO.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the ACWI.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UKCO.L and ACWI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

UKCO.LACWI.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

2.89

-2.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.22

0.96

-1.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

0.94

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.81

-0.41

Drawdowns

UKCO.L vs. ACWI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UKCO.L drawdown since its inception was -30.79%, which is greater than ACWI.L's maximum drawdown of -25.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UKCO.L and ACWI.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

UKCO.LACWI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.79%

-25.44%

-5.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.99%

-7.05%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.99%

-18.07%

+12.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.89%

-18.07%

-11.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.79%

-25.44%

-5.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.38%

-0.41%

-11.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.60%

-3.67%

-2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

1.74%

+0.96%

Volatility

UKCO.L vs. ACWI.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (UKCO.L) is 2.30%, while SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L) has a volatility of 2.90%. This indicates that UKCO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

UKCO.LACWI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.30%

2.90%

-0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.16%

7.75%

-2.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.55%

10.42%

-3.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.96%

13.05%

-5.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.29%

14.39%

-6.10%

UKCO.L vs. ACWI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UKCO.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

UKCO.L vs. ACWI.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither UKCO.L nor ACWI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI.L
SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UKCO.L
SPDR Bloomberg Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF		0.00%2.16%4.11%3.30%2.79%2.28%2.40%2.51%2.69%3.09%3.17%3.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

UKCO.L and ACWI.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UKCO.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UKCO.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ACWI.L.

UKCO.L is categorized as European Corporate Bonds, while ACWI.L is Global Equities. UKCO.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts TR, while ACWI.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for UKCO.L and 0.40% for ACWI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UKCO.L and ACWI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer