UJUL vs. PQAP
UJUL (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - July) and PQAP (PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. UJUL is passively managed, while PQAP is actively managed. Over the past year, UJUL returned 14.79% vs 21.47% for PQAP. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UJUL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PQAP.
Performance
UJUL vs. PQAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UJUL achieves a 4.63% return, which is significantly lower than PQAP's 12.09% return.
UJUL
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- 4.63%
- 6M
- 5.28%
- 1Y
- 14.79%
- 3Y*
- 12.85%
- 5Y*
- 8.54%
- 10Y*
- —
PQAP
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- YTD
- 12.09%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 21.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UJUL vs. PQAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - July | 4.63% | 12.44% |
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April | 12.09% | 14.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between UJUL and PQAP is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025 | 0.85 |
The correlation between UJUL and PQAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UJUL vs. PQAP — Risk / Return Rank
UJUL
PQAP
UJUL vs. PQAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - July (UJUL) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UJUL | PQAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 2.20 | -0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.73 | 15.50 | -11.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.30 | 86.25 | -64.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UJUL | PQAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.64 | 4.86 | -2.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 1.76 | -0.96 |
Drawdowns
UJUL vs. PQAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UJUL drawdown since its inception was -14.11%, which is greater than PQAP's maximum drawdown of -10.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UJUL and PQAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UJUL | PQAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.11% | -10.79% | -3.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.98% | -1.39% | -2.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.12% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.86% | -0.60% | -1.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.70% | 0.25% | +0.45% |
Volatility
UJUL vs. PQAP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - July (UJUL) is 0.38%, while PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP) has a volatility of 1.02%. This indicates that UJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PQAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UJUL | PQAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.38% | 1.02% | -0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.02% | 3.09% | +0.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.66% | 4.45% | +1.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.12% | 11.03% | -2.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.94% | 11.03% | -2.09% |
UJUL vs. PQAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
UJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PQAP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
UJUL vs. PQAP - Dividend Comparison
UJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PQAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UJUL and PQAP have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PQAP has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to UJUL (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UJUL dropped -14.11% vs PQAP's -10.79%.
On 1-year performance, PQAP leads with 21.47% vs 14.79% for UJUL. On fees, PQAP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, UJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PQAP has performed better with a 21.47% return vs 14.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PQAP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UJUL.
PQAP has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for UJUL.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for UJUL and 0.50% for PQAP.
PQAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.86 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UJUL and PQAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer