PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UJUL vs. DMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UJUL vs. DMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - July (UJUL) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UJUL achieves a 4.62% return, which is significantly higher than DMAX's 2.40% return.


UJUL

1D
-0.01%
1M
1.17%
YTD
4.62%
6M
5.11%
1Y
14.76%
3Y*
12.89%
5Y*
8.54%
10Y*

DMAX

1D
0.05%
1M
0.80%
YTD
2.40%
6M
3.08%
1Y
8.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UJUL vs. DMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between UJUL and DMAX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025

0.83

The correlation between UJUL and DMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UJUL vs. DMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UJUL
UJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
UJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
UJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
UJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
UJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

DMAX
DMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
DMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UJUL vs. DMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - July (UJUL) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UJULDMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.78

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.73

5.98

-2.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.27

30.60

-9.33

UJUL vs. DMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the DMAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UJUL and DMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UJULDMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

3.63

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

2.15

-1.35

Drawdowns

UJUL vs. DMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UJUL drawdown since its inception was -14.11%, which is greater than DMAX's maximum drawdown of -3.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UJUL and DMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UJULDMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.11%

-3.37%

-10.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.98%

-1.41%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-0.02%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.86%

-0.38%

-1.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

0.28%

+0.42%

Volatility

UJUL vs. DMAX - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - July (UJUL) has a higher volatility of 0.37% compared to iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX) at 0.31%. This indicates that UJUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UJULDMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.37%

0.31%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.02%

1.54%

+2.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.63%

2.33%

+3.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.12%

3.39%

+4.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.94%

3.39%

+5.55%

UJUL vs. DMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

UJUL vs. DMAX - Dividend Comparison

UJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
DMAX
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF
1.15%1.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UJUL
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%6.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


UJUL and DMAX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UJUL has higher volatility (0.37%) compared to DMAX (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UJUL dropped -14.11% vs DMAX's -3.37%.

On 1-year performance, UJUL leads with 14.76% vs 8.42% for DMAX. On fees, DMAX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, UJUL has performed better with a 14.76% return vs 8.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DMAX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UJUL.

DMAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.00% for UJUL.

UJUL tracks S&P 500, while DMAX tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for UJUL and 0.50% for DMAX.

DMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.63 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UJUL and DMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer