UJUL vs. APXM
UJUL (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - July) and APXM (FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. UJUL is passively managed, while APXM is actively managed. Over the past year, UJUL returned 14.79% vs 5.49% for APXM. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UJUL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for APXM.
Performance
UJUL vs. APXM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UJUL achieves a 4.63% return, which is significantly higher than APXM's 2.11% return.
UJUL
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- 4.63%
- 6M
- 5.28%
- 1Y
- 14.79%
- 3Y*
- 12.85%
- 5Y*
- 8.54%
- 10Y*
- —
APXM
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 2.11%
- 6M
- 2.59%
- 1Y
- 5.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UJUL vs. APXM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - July | 4.63% | 21.84% |
APXM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April | 2.11% | 5.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between UJUL and APXM is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2025 | 0.67 |
The correlation between UJUL and APXM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UJUL vs. APXM — Risk / Return Rank
UJUL
APXM
UJUL vs. APXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - July (UJUL) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April (APXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UJUL | APXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 2.60 | -1.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.73 | 20.36 | -16.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.30 | 110.99 | -89.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UJUL | APXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.64 | 5.47 | -2.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 5.70 | -4.90 |
Drawdowns
UJUL vs. APXM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UJUL drawdown since its inception was -14.11%, which is greater than APXM's maximum drawdown of -0.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UJUL and APXM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UJUL | APXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.11% | -0.40% | -13.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.98% | -0.27% | -3.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.06% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.86% | -0.03% | -1.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.70% | 0.05% | +0.65% |
Volatility
UJUL vs. APXM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - July (UJUL) is 0.38%, while FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April (APXM) has a volatility of 0.42%. This indicates that UJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APXM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UJUL | APXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.38% | 0.42% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.02% | 0.78% | +3.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.66% | 1.01% | +4.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.12% | 1.20% | +6.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.94% | 1.20% | +7.74% |
UJUL vs. APXM - Expense Ratio Comparison
UJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than APXM's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
UJUL vs. APXM - Dividend Comparison
Neither UJUL nor APXM has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APXM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UJUL and APXM have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
APXM has higher volatility (0.42%) compared to UJUL (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UJUL dropped -14.11% vs APXM's -0.40%.
On 1-year performance, UJUL leads with 14.79% vs 5.49% for APXM. On fees, UJUL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, UJUL has performed better with a 14.79% return vs 5.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UJUL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for APXM.
UJUL and APXM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for UJUL and 0.85% for APXM.
APXM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.47 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UJUL and APXM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer