PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UIQN.DE vs. AMES.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UIQN.DE vs. AMES.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (EUR) A-acc (UIQN.DE) and Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UIQN.DE achieves a 7.72% return, which is significantly higher than AMES.DE's 7.00% return.


UIQN.DE

1D
0.22%
1M
0.35%
YTD
7.72%
6M
10.25%
1Y
13.50%
3Y*
15.10%
5Y*
9.53%
10Y*

AMES.DE

1D
0.51%
1M
1.18%
YTD
7.00%
6M
11.24%
1Y
32.97%
3Y*
29.84%
5Y*
19.21%
10Y*
11.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UIQN.DE vs. AMES.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
UIQN.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (EUR) A-acc
7.72%23.72%7.69%17.74%-13.01%21.24%0.20%27.52%-13.41%
AMES.DE
Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR
7.00%55.41%19.00%25.94%0.03%6.96%-12.87%15.76%-11.94%

Correlation

The correlation between UIQN.DE and AMES.DE is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2018

0.71

The correlation between UIQN.DE and AMES.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (all time) to 0.87 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UIQN.DE vs. AMES.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UIQN.DE
UIQN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
UIQN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UIQN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
UIQN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
UIQN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
UIQN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

AMES.DE
AMES.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
AMES.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UIQN.DE vs. AMES.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (EUR) A-acc (UIQN.DE) and Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UIQN.DEAMES.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.37

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

3.40

-1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.35

11.80

-6.45

UIQN.DE vs. AMES.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UIQN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the AMES.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UIQN.DE and AMES.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UIQN.DEAMES.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

2.06

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

1.20

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.48

+0.07

Drawdowns

UIQN.DE vs. AMES.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UIQN.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.48%, smaller than the maximum AMES.DE drawdown of -40.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIQN.DE and AMES.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UIQN.DEAMES.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.48%

-40.98%

+3.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.45%

-9.95%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.66%

-12.58%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.11%

-17.77%

-6.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

-0.52%

-0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.59%

-9.76%

+4.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

2.87%

-0.29%

Volatility

UIQN.DE vs. AMES.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (EUR) A-acc (UIQN.DE) is 3.88%, while Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE) has a volatility of 4.59%. This indicates that UIQN.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMES.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UIQN.DEAMES.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

4.59%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.50%

13.65%

-3.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.65%

16.43%

-3.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.49%

18.01%

-3.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.26%

20.82%

-4.56%

UIQN.DE vs. AMES.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UIQN.DE has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than AMES.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

UIQN.DE vs. AMES.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither UIQN.DE nor AMES.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


UIQN.DE and AMES.DE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMES.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMES.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UIQN.DE.

UIQN.DE tracks MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix, while AMES.DE tracks MSCI Spain. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for UIQN.DE and 0.25% for AMES.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UIQN.DE and AMES.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer