UIQK.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE
UIQK.DE (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and 4UBQ.DE (UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - UIQK.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS CMCI, while 4UBQ.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 ESG. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UIQK.DE returned 12.61%/yr vs 15.51%/yr for 4UBQ.DE. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UIQK.DE charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for 4UBQ.DE.
Performance
UIQK.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UIQK.DE achieves a 22.10% return, which is significantly higher than 4UBQ.DE's 11.15% return.
UIQK.DE
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- YTD
- 22.10%
- 6M
- 23.08%
- 1Y
- 28.80%
- 3Y*
- 10.29%
- 5Y*
- 12.61%
- 10Y*
- 8.63%
4UBQ.DE
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 5.42%
- YTD
- 11.15%
- 6M
- 11.64%
- 1Y
- 28.57%
- 3Y*
- 18.50%
- 5Y*
- 15.51%
- 10Y*
- —
UIQK.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UIQK.DE UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 22.10% | -1.67% | 10.72% | -4.23% | 22.43% | 46.71% | 8.10% |
4UBQ.DE UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc | 11.15% | 5.39% | 31.02% | 24.03% | -13.92% | 43.62% | 8.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between UIQK.DE and 4UBQ.DE is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2020 | 0.23 |
The correlation between UIQK.DE and 4UBQ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UIQK.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
UIQK.DE
4UBQ.DE
UIQK.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UIQK.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UIQK.DE | 4UBQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.46 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 4.10 | -2.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.75 | 15.73 | -11.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UIQK.DE | 4UBQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 2.47 | -1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 1.00 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 1.11 | -0.83 |
Drawdowns
UIQK.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UIQK.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.58%, which is greater than 4UBQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIQK.DE and 4UBQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UIQK.DE | 4UBQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.58% | -23.35% | -17.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.84% | -6.93% | -8.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.84% | -23.35% | +7.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.37% | -23.35% | +5.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.23% | 0.00% | -3.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.71% | -4.02% | -10.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.66% | 1.81% | +5.85% |
Volatility
UIQK.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UIQK.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE) at 2.81%. This indicates that UIQK.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 4UBQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UIQK.DE | 4UBQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.01% | 2.81% | +2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.05% | 7.61% | +4.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.76% | 11.53% | +14.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.74% | 15.27% | +2.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 15.39% | +0.51% |
UIQK.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
UIQK.DE has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than 4UBQ.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
UIQK.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither UIQK.DE nor 4UBQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UIQK.DE and 4UBQ.DE have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 4UBQ.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
4UBQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UIQK.DE.
UIQK.DE is categorized as Commodities, while 4UBQ.DE is S&P 500. UIQK.DE tracks UBS CMCI, while 4UBQ.DE tracks S&P 500 ESG. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for UIQK.DE and 0.10% for 4UBQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for UIQK.DE and 4UBQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer