UIQ1.DE vs. C099.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UIQ1.DE (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) and C099.DE (Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) are both Commodities funds - UIQ1.DE tracks the UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped (EUR Hedged) while C099.DE tracks the Bloomberg Energy and Metals Equal-Weighted (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UIQ1.DE returned 15.74%/yr vs 21.14%/yr for C099.DE. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UIQ1.DE charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for C099.DE.

Performance

UIQ1.DE vs. C099.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (UIQ1.DE) and Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (C099.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UIQ1.DE achieves a 22.64% return, which is significantly lower than C099.DE's 28.92% return.

UIQ1.DE

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: 22.64%
• 6M: 26.02%
• 1Y: 39.84%
• 3Y*: 15.74%
• 5Y*: 10.90%
• 10Y*: —

C099.DE

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: -1.58%
• YTD: 28.92%
• 6M: 38.05%
• 1Y: 63.83%
• 3Y*: 21.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UIQ1.DE vs. C099.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
UIQ1.DE UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc	22.64%	17.35%	4.90%	-6.53%
C099.DE Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc	28.92%	29.62%	4.85%	-8.37%

Correlation

The correlation between UIQ1.DE and C099.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2023	0.92

The correlation between UIQ1.DE and C099.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

UIQ1.DE vs. C099.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UIQ1.DE

UIQ1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 83
UIQ1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
UIQ1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
UIQ1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 80
UIQ1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
UIQ1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 84

C099.DE

C099.DE Risk / Return Rank: 85
C099.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
C099.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
C099.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 84
C099.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
C099.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UIQ1.DE vs. C099.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (UIQ1.DE) and Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (C099.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UIQ1.DE	C099.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.64	2.92	-0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.40	3.47	-0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.50	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.99	5.06	+0.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.75	17.91	-1.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UIQ1.DE vs. C099.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UIQ1.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is comparable to the C099.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UIQ1.DE and C099.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UIQ1.DE	C099.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.64	2.92	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.85	-0.34

Drawdowns

UIQ1.DE vs. C099.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UIQ1.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.99%, which is greater than C099.DE's maximum drawdown of -15.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIQ1.DE and C099.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	UIQ1.DE	C099.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.99%	-15.35%	-24.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.62%	-12.55%	+5.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.55%	-15.35%	+1.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.05%	-4.74%	+2.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.09%	-6.21%	-8.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.37%	3.55%	-1.18%

Volatility

UIQ1.DE vs. C099.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (UIQ1.DE) is 3.79%, while Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (C099.DE) has a volatility of 5.09%. This indicates that UIQ1.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than C099.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UIQ1.DE	C099.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.79%	5.09%	-1.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.91%	19.66%	-6.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.03%	21.77%	-6.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.19%	17.90%	+0.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.45%	17.90%	-0.45%

UIQ1.DE vs. C099.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UIQ1.DE has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than C099.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

UIQ1.DE vs. C099.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither UIQ1.DE nor C099.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UIQ1.DE and C099.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, UIQ1.DE and C099.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, UIQ1.DE or C099.DE?

On fees, UIQ1.DE is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UIQ1.DE or C099.DE?

UIQ1.DE is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for C099.DE.

What is the main difference between UIQ1.DE and C099.DE?

UIQ1.DE tracks UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped (EUR Hedged), while C099.DE tracks Bloomberg Energy and Metals Equal-Weighted (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: UBS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for UIQ1.DE and 0.35% for C099.DE.