UIPIX vs. UHPIX
UIPIX (ProFunds UltraShort Mid Cap Fund) and UHPIX (ProFunds UltraShort China) are both Inverse Equities funds from ProFunds. Over the past 10 years, UIPIX returned -6.31%/yr vs -30.17%/yr for UHPIX. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 1.78% expense ratio.
Performance
UIPIX vs. UHPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UIPIX achieves a -24.21% return, which is significantly lower than UHPIX's 38.39% return. Over the past 10 years, UIPIX has outperformed UHPIX with an annualized return of -6.31%, while UHPIX has yielded a comparatively lower -30.17% annualized return.
UIPIX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- 6M
- -16.71%
- YTD
- -24.21%
- 1Y
- -29.86%
- 3Y*
- -21.99%
- 5Y*
- 30.14%
- 10Y*
- -6.31%
UHPIX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- 6M
- 64.97%
- YTD
- 38.39%
- 1Y
- 7.34%
- 3Y*
- -24.76%
- 5Y*
- -26.47%
- 10Y*
- -30.17%
UIPIX vs. UHPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UIPIX ProFunds UltraShort Mid Cap Fund | -24.21% | -13.23% | -22.21% | 668.01% | 11.30% | -42.71% | -53.90% | -38.37% | 21.21% | -27.33% |
UHPIX ProFunds UltraShort China | 38.39% | -49.82% | -29.87% | -26.13% | -63.62% | 94.89% | -64.76% | -43.34% | 39.47% | -57.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between UIPIX and UHPIX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2008 | 0.59 |
Over the past year, the correlation between UIPIX and UHPIX has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UIPIX vs. UHPIX — Risk / Return Rank
UIPIX
UHPIX
UIPIX vs. UHPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraShort Mid Cap Fund (UIPIX) and ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UIPIX | UHPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.07 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | 0.18 | -0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | 0.35 | -1.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UIPIX vs. UHPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UIPIX drawdown since its inception was -99.84%, roughly equal to the maximum UHPIX drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIPIX and UHPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UIPIX | UHPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.84% | -99.98% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.54% | -43.77% | +8.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.67% | -80.64% | +14.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.67% | -96.64% | +30.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.12% | -98.57% | +8.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.21% | -99.96% | +0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -80.82% | -93.43% | +12.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.31% | 23.34% | -4.03% |
Volatility
UIPIX vs. UHPIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProFunds UltraShort Mid Cap Fund (UIPIX) is 9.20%, while ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX) has a volatility of 15.69%. This indicates that UIPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UHPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UIPIX | UHPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.20% | 15.69% | -6.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.37% | 38.78% | -15.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.50% | 53.59% | -22.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 418.70% | 82.92% | +335.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 297.53% | 228.55% | +68.98% |
UIPIX vs. UHPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UIPIX and UHPIX have an expense ratio of 1.78%.
Dividends
UIPIX vs. UHPIX - Dividend Comparison
UIPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, more than UHPIX's 3.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UHPIX ProFunds UltraShort China | 3.10% | 4.29% | 0.00% | 3.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.55% |
UIPIX ProFunds UltraShort Mid Cap Fund | 3.44% | 2.60% | 0.00% | 4.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UIPIX and UHPIX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UHPIX has higher volatility (15.69%) compared to UIPIX (9.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UIPIX dropped -99.84% vs UHPIX's -99.98%.
UHPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UIPIX and UHPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer