PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UIMS.DE vs. 4UBF.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UIMS.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Small Cap Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (UIMS.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (4UBF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UIMS.DE achieves a 8.11% return, which is significantly higher than 4UBF.DE's 0.73% return.


UIMS.DE

1D
1.27%
1M
2.29%
YTD
8.11%
6M
9.71%
1Y
18.89%
3Y*
10.29%
5Y*
10Y*

4UBF.DE

1D
0.12%
1M
0.81%
YTD
0.73%
6M
0.31%
1Y
2.01%
3Y*
4.95%
5Y*
-0.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UIMS.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UIMS.DE
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Small Cap Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc
8.11%3.87%10.60%12.71%-13.27%5.80%
4UBF.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc
0.73%3.23%4.51%8.22%-15.67%-1.85%

Correlation

The correlation between UIMS.DE and 4UBF.DE is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2021

0.30

The correlation between UIMS.DE and 4UBF.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UIMS.DE vs. 4UBF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UIMS.DE
UIMS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
UIMS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UIMS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
UIMS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
UIMS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
UIMS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

4UBF.DE
4UBF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
4UBF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4UBF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
4UBF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
4UBF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
4UBF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UIMS.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Small Cap Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (UIMS.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (4UBF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UIMS.DE4UBF.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.10

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.07

0.69

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.19

2.30

-0.11

UIMS.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UIMS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is higher than the 4UBF.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UIMS.DE and 4UBF.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UIMS.DE4UBF.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

0.55

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

-0.04

+0.31

Drawdowns

UIMS.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UIMS.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.71%, which is greater than 4UBF.DE's maximum drawdown of -19.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIMS.DE and 4UBF.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UIMS.DE4UBF.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.71%

-19.99%

-5.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.51%

-2.88%

-14.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.71%

-2.88%

-22.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.29%

-2.81%

-2.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.94%

-8.54%

-0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.61%

0.87%

+7.74%

Volatility

UIMS.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Small Cap Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (UIMS.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (4UBF.DE) at 1.25%. This indicates that UIMS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 4UBF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UIMS.DE4UBF.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

1.25%

+2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.61%

3.11%

+7.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.40%

3.67%

+22.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.90%

5.08%

+14.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.90%

5.02%

+14.88%

UIMS.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UIMS.DE has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than 4UBF.DE's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UIMS.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither UIMS.DE nor 4UBF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


UIMS.DE and 4UBF.DE have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 4UBF.DE is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

4UBF.DE is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for UIMS.DE.

UIMS.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while 4UBF.DE is European Corporate Bonds. UIMS.DE tracks MSCI World Small Cap SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while 4UBF.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for UIMS.DE and 0.13% for 4UBF.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UIMS.DE and 4UBF.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer