PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UIMR.DE vs. XESP.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UIMR.DE vs. XESP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UIMR.DE) and Xtrackers Spanish Equity UCITS ETF (XESP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UIMR.DE achieves a 9.04% return, which is significantly lower than XESP.DE's 14.86% return. Over the past 10 years, UIMR.DE has underperformed XESP.DE with an annualized return of 10.24%, while XESP.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 14.03% annualized return.


UIMR.DE

1D
0.90%
1M
2.47%
YTD
9.04%
6M
10.15%
1Y
15.40%
3Y*
13.79%
5Y*
7.08%
10Y*
10.24%

XESP.DE

1D
0.87%
1M
6.89%
YTD
14.86%
6M
15.90%
1Y
48.43%
3Y*
32.37%
5Y*
20.37%
10Y*
14.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UIMR.DE vs. XESP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UIMR.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
9.04%14.30%12.70%12.99%-15.85%21.22%-0.84%31.79%-8.67%14.91%
XESP.DE
Xtrackers Spanish Equity UCITS ETF
14.86%58.64%14.63%26.81%-1.62%10.85%-10.20%15.89%-12.41%12.92%

Correlation

The correlation between UIMR.DE and XESP.DE is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2011

0.77

The correlation between UIMR.DE and XESP.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UIMR.DE vs. XESP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UIMR.DE
UIMR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
UIMR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UIMR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
UIMR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
UIMR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
UIMR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

XESP.DE
XESP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
XESP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XESP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
XESP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
XESP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
XESP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UIMR.DE vs. XESP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UIMR.DE) and Xtrackers Spanish Equity UCITS ETF (XESP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UIMR.DEXESP.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.51

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

4.74

-3.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.97

16.84

-11.87

UIMR.DE vs. XESP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UIMR.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the XESP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UIMR.DE and XESP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UIMR.DE vs. XESP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UIMR.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.55%, smaller than the maximum XESP.DE drawdown of -40.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIMR.DE and XESP.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UIMR.DEXESP.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.55%

-40.70%

+3.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.70%

-10.17%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.69%

-12.92%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.63%

-18.56%

-8.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.55%

-39.03%

+1.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-0.10%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.12%

-10.06%

+4.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

2.87%

+0.22%

Volatility

UIMR.DE vs. XESP.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UIMR.DE) is 3.54%, while Xtrackers Spanish Equity UCITS ETF (XESP.DE) has a volatility of 4.20%. This indicates that UIMR.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XESP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UIMR.DEXESP.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

4.20%

-0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.23%

14.44%

-1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.42%

17.00%

-1.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.06%

16.73%

-0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.80%

18.44%

-1.64%

UIMR.DE vs. XESP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UIMR.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XESP.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

UIMR.DE vs. XESP.DE - Dividend Comparison

UIMR.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, while XESP.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UIMR.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
1.54%1.87%1.91%2.26%2.80%2.10%1.69%2.61%3.34%2.69%3.34%2.66%
XESP.DE
Xtrackers Spanish Equity UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UIMR.DE and XESP.DE have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UIMR.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UIMR.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XESP.DE.

UIMR.DE tracks MSCI EMU SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while XESP.DE tracks Solactive Spain 40. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for UIMR.DE and 0.30% for XESP.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UIMR.DE and XESP.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer