PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UIMR.DE vs. EHF1.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UIMR.DE vs. EHF1.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UIMR.DE) and Amundi MSCI Europe High Dividend Factor UCITS ETF EUR (EHF1.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UIMR.DE achieves a 7.06% return, which is significantly higher than EHF1.DE's 5.17% return.


UIMR.DE

1D
0.40%
1M
3.90%
YTD
7.06%
6M
8.72%
1Y
9.97%
3Y*
12.58%
5Y*
7.07%
10Y*
9.02%

EHF1.DE

1D
0.61%
1M
-1.98%
YTD
5.17%
6M
7.16%
1Y
12.60%
3Y*
14.05%
5Y*
11.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UIMR.DE vs. EHF1.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
UIMR.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
7.06%14.40%12.70%12.99%-15.85%21.22%-0.84%31.79%-9.78%
EHF1.DE
Amundi MSCI Europe High Dividend Factor UCITS ETF EUR
5.17%19.17%9.83%14.12%1.04%18.25%-9.78%24.88%-2.98%

Correlation

The correlation between UIMR.DE and EHF1.DE is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2018

0.70

The correlation between UIMR.DE and EHF1.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UIMR.DE vs. EHF1.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UIMR.DE
UIMR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
UIMR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UIMR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
UIMR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
UIMR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
UIMR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

EHF1.DE
EHF1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
EHF1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EHF1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
EHF1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
EHF1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
EHF1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UIMR.DE vs. EHF1.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UIMR.DE) and Amundi MSCI Europe High Dividend Factor UCITS ETF EUR (EHF1.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UIMR.DEEHF1.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.25

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

2.09

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.08

5.91

-2.83

UIMR.DE vs. EHF1.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UIMR.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the EHF1.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UIMR.DE and EHF1.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UIMR.DEEHF1.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

1.31

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.91

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.58

+0.07

Drawdowns

UIMR.DE vs. EHF1.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UIMR.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.55%, roughly equal to the maximum EHF1.DE drawdown of -38.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIMR.DE and EHF1.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UIMR.DEEHF1.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.55%

-38.13%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-6.24%

-4.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.69%

-12.89%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.63%

-15.64%

-10.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-4.13%

+3.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-4.65%

-0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.29%

2.21%

+1.08%

Volatility

UIMR.DE vs. EHF1.DE - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UIMR.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to Amundi MSCI Europe High Dividend Factor UCITS ETF EUR (EHF1.DE) at 3.69%. This indicates that UIMR.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EHF1.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UIMR.DEEHF1.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

3.69%

+0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.02%

7.94%

+4.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.50%

9.92%

+4.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.88%

12.28%

+3.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

15.39%

+1.55%

UIMR.DE vs. EHF1.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UIMR.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EHF1.DE's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UIMR.DE vs. EHF1.DE - Dividend Comparison

UIMR.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, while EHF1.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EHF1.DE
Amundi MSCI Europe High Dividend Factor UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UIMR.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
1.57%1.86%1.91%2.26%2.80%2.10%1.69%2.61%3.34%2.69%3.34%2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


UIMR.DE and EHF1.DE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UIMR.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UIMR.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for EHF1.DE.

UIMR.DE tracks MSCI EMU SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while EHF1.DE tracks MSCI Europe High Dividend Yield. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for UIMR.DE and 0.23% for EHF1.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UIMR.DE and EHF1.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer