UIMR.DE vs. BCFE.DE
UIMR.DE (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis) and BCFE.DE (UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - UIMR.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while BCFE.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS BCOM Constant Maturity (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UIMR.DE returned 7.07%/yr vs 9.76%/yr for BCFE.DE. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UIMR.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for BCFE.DE.
Performance
UIMR.DE vs. BCFE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UIMR.DE achieves a 7.06% return, which is significantly lower than BCFE.DE's 17.15% return.
UIMR.DE
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 3.90%
- YTD
- 7.06%
- 6M
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- 9.97%
- 3Y*
- 12.58%
- 5Y*
- 7.07%
- 10Y*
- 9.02%
BCFE.DE
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 17.15%
- 6M
- 18.41%
- 1Y
- 28.89%
- 3Y*
- 12.43%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- —
UIMR.DE vs. BCFE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UIMR.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 7.06% | 14.40% | 12.70% | 12.99% | -15.85% | 21.22% | -0.84% | 31.79% | -8.67% | 2.38% |
BCFE.DE UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | 17.15% | 16.62% | 3.14% | -7.92% | 14.03% | 30.33% | -0.98% | 3.51% | -10.71% | 7.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between UIMR.DE and BCFE.DE is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017 | 0.17 |
The correlation between UIMR.DE and BCFE.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UIMR.DE vs. BCFE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
UIMR.DE
BCFE.DE
UIMR.DE vs. BCFE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UIMR.DE) and UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (BCFE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UIMR.DE | BCFE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.40 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 4.83 | -3.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.08 | 11.89 | -8.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UIMR.DE | BCFE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 2.14 | -1.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.55 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.49 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
UIMR.DE vs. BCFE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UIMR.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.55%, which is greater than BCFE.DE's maximum drawdown of -32.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIMR.DE and BCFE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UIMR.DE | BCFE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.55% | -32.93% | -4.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -6.14% | -5.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.69% | -11.00% | -3.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.63% | -27.28% | +0.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -4.36% | +3.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -13.69% | +8.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 2.50% | +0.79% |
Volatility
UIMR.DE vs. BCFE.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UIMR.DE) and UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (BCFE.DE) have volatilities of 4.46% and 4.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UIMR.DE | BCFE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.46% | 4.33% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.02% | 12.10% | -0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.50% | 13.88% | +0.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.88% | 17.51% | -1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 15.30% | +1.64% |
UIMR.DE vs. BCFE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
UIMR.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BCFE.DE's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
UIMR.DE vs. BCFE.DE - Dividend Comparison
UIMR.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, while BCFE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCFE.DE UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UIMR.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 1.57% | 1.86% | 1.91% | 2.26% | 2.80% | 2.10% | 1.69% | 2.61% | 3.34% | 2.69% | 3.34% | 2.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UIMR.DE and BCFE.DE have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UIMR.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UIMR.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for BCFE.DE.
UIMR.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while BCFE.DE is Commodities. UIMR.DE tracks MSCI EMU SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while BCFE.DE tracks UBS BCOM Constant Maturity (EUR Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.20% for UIMR.DE and 0.34% for BCFE.DE.
Find the right allocation for UIMR.DE and BCFE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer