PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UIMR.DE vs. AMES.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UIMR.DE vs. AMES.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UIMR.DE) and Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UIMR.DE achieves a 9.04% return, which is significantly lower than AMES.DE's 14.53% return. Over the past 10 years, UIMR.DE has underperformed AMES.DE with an annualized return of 10.24%, while AMES.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 13.44% annualized return.


UIMR.DE

1D
0.90%
1M
2.47%
YTD
9.04%
6M
10.15%
1Y
15.40%
3Y*
13.79%
5Y*
7.08%
10Y*
10.24%

AMES.DE

1D
0.72%
1M
7.06%
YTD
14.53%
6M
15.44%
1Y
46.37%
3Y*
32.90%
5Y*
20.69%
10Y*
13.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UIMR.DE vs. AMES.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UIMR.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
9.04%14.30%12.70%12.99%-15.85%21.22%-0.84%31.79%-8.67%14.91%
AMES.DE
Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR
14.53%55.41%19.00%26.86%-0.71%6.98%-12.87%15.76%-12.77%11.84%

Correlation

The correlation between UIMR.DE and AMES.DE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2011

0.73

The correlation between UIMR.DE and AMES.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.76 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UIMR.DE vs. AMES.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UIMR.DE
UIMR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
UIMR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UIMR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
UIMR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
UIMR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
UIMR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

AMES.DE
AMES.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AMES.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UIMR.DE vs. AMES.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UIMR.DE) and Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UIMR.DEAMES.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.50

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

4.64

-3.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.97

16.40

-11.43

UIMR.DE vs. AMES.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UIMR.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the AMES.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UIMR.DE and AMES.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UIMR.DE vs. AMES.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UIMR.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.55%, smaller than the maximum AMES.DE drawdown of -40.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIMR.DE and AMES.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UIMR.DEAMES.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.55%

-40.98%

+3.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.70%

-9.95%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.69%

-12.58%

-2.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.63%

-17.77%

-8.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.55%

-40.98%

+3.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-0.10%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.12%

-10.09%

+4.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

2.82%

+0.27%

Volatility

UIMR.DE vs. AMES.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UIMR.DE) is 3.54%, while Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE) has a volatility of 4.04%. This indicates that UIMR.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMES.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UIMR.DEAMES.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

4.04%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.23%

13.99%

-0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.42%

16.47%

-1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.06%

16.97%

-0.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.80%

18.42%

-1.62%

UIMR.DE vs. AMES.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UIMR.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than AMES.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UIMR.DE vs. AMES.DE - Dividend Comparison

UIMR.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, while AMES.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMES.DE
Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UIMR.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
1.54%1.87%1.91%2.26%2.80%2.10%1.69%2.61%3.34%2.69%3.34%2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


UIMR.DE and AMES.DE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UIMR.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UIMR.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AMES.DE.

UIMR.DE tracks MSCI EMU SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while AMES.DE tracks MSCI Spain. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for UIMR.DE and 0.25% for AMES.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UIMR.DE and AMES.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer