UIMP.DE vs. WEBC.DE
UIMP.DE (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and WEBC.DE (Amundi MSCI North America ESG Broad Transition UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - UIMP.DE tracks the MSCI USA SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped while WEBC.DE tracks the MSCI North America ESG Broad CTB Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, UIMP.DE returned 23.82% vs 22.93% for WEBC.DE. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UIMP.DE charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for WEBC.DE.
Performance
UIMP.DE vs. WEBC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UIMP.DE achieves a 15.85% return, which is significantly higher than WEBC.DE's 12.50% return.
UIMP.DE
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- 6M
- 14.60%
- YTD
- 15.85%
- 1Y
- 23.82%
- 3Y*
- 15.91%
- 5Y*
- 11.33%
- 10Y*
- 13.76%
WEBC.DE
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 11.85%
- YTD
- 12.50%
- 1Y
- 22.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UIMP.DE vs. WEBC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
UIMP.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 15.85% | -1.33% | 25.94% | 8.57% |
WEBC.DE Amundi MSCI North America ESG Broad Transition UCITS ETF (Dist) | 12.50% | 3.77% | 30.70% | 6.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between UIMP.DE and WEBC.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2023 | 0.91 |
The correlation between UIMP.DE and WEBC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UIMP.DE vs. WEBC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
UIMP.DE
WEBC.DE
UIMP.DE vs. WEBC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMP.DE) and Amundi MSCI North America ESG Broad Transition UCITS ETF (Dist) (WEBC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UIMP.DE | WEBC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.34 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | 2.83 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.06 | 9.78 | -1.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UIMP.DE vs. WEBC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UIMP.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, which is greater than WEBC.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIMP.DE and WEBC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UIMP.DE | WEBC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.37% | -23.69% | -9.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.42% | -8.07% | -1.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.40% | -0.11% | -2.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.04% | -3.32% | -4.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 2.34% | +0.61% |
Volatility
UIMP.DE vs. WEBC.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMP.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to Amundi MSCI North America ESG Broad Transition UCITS ETF (Dist) (WEBC.DE) at 2.78%. This indicates that UIMP.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WEBC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UIMP.DE | WEBC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.43% | 2.78% | +1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.37% | 8.15% | +2.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.02% | 12.21% | +1.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.65% | 14.63% | +2.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 14.63% | +2.24% |
UIMP.DE vs. WEBC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
UIMP.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than WEBC.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UIMP.DE vs. WEBC.DE - Dividend Comparison
UIMP.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than WEBC.DE's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UIMP.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.41% | 0.82% | 0.70% | 0.75% | 0.92% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 0.97% | 1.03% | 1.25% | 1.26% | 1.25% |
WEBC.DE Amundi MSCI North America ESG Broad Transition UCITS ETF (Dist) | 0.77% | 0.99% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, UIMP.DE and WEBC.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, WEBC.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WEBC.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for UIMP.DE.
UIMP.DE tracks MSCI USA SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while WEBC.DE tracks MSCI North America ESG Broad CTB Select Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for UIMP.DE and 0.15% for WEBC.DE.
Find the right allocation for UIMP.DE and WEBC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer