PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UIMP.DE vs. OP7E.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UIMP.DE vs. OP7E.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMP.DE) and Ossiam Bloomberg USA PAB UCITS ETF (EUR) (OP7E.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UIMP.DE achieves a 15.73% return, which is significantly higher than OP7E.DE's 9.93% return.


UIMP.DE

1D
-0.18%
1M
3.59%
YTD
15.73%
6M
16.07%
1Y
25.88%
3Y*
16.74%
5Y*
11.85%
10Y*
14.71%

OP7E.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
2.03%
YTD
9.93%
6M
10.45%
1Y
19.65%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UIMP.DE vs. OP7E.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
UIMP.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
15.73%-1.33%25.94%27.84%-6.10%
OP7E.DE
Ossiam Bloomberg USA PAB UCITS ETF (EUR)
9.93%1.18%29.02%22.72%-4.69%

Correlation

The correlation between UIMP.DE and OP7E.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2022

0.94

The correlation between UIMP.DE and OP7E.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UIMP.DE vs. OP7E.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UIMP.DE
UIMP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
UIMP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UIMP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
UIMP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
UIMP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
UIMP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

OP7E.DE
OP7E.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
OP7E.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OP7E.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
OP7E.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
OP7E.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
OP7E.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UIMP.DE vs. OP7E.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMP.DE) and Ossiam Bloomberg USA PAB UCITS ETF (EUR) (OP7E.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UIMP.DEOP7E.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.29

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

2.19

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.82

7.01

+1.81

UIMP.DE vs. OP7E.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UIMP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the OP7E.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UIMP.DE and OP7E.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UIMP.DE vs. OP7E.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UIMP.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, which is greater than OP7E.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIMP.DE and OP7E.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UIMP.DEOP7E.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.37%

-23.71%

-9.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.42%

-8.94%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.74%

-23.71%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-0.06%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.06%

-5.22%

-2.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

2.79%

+0.14%

Volatility

UIMP.DE vs. OP7E.DE - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMP.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.04% compared to Ossiam Bloomberg USA PAB UCITS ETF (EUR) (OP7E.DE) at 3.51%. This indicates that UIMP.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OP7E.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UIMP.DEOP7E.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

3.51%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.01%

8.63%

+1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.63%

12.36%

+1.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.59%

14.87%

+1.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.87%

14.87%

+2.00%

UIMP.DE vs. OP7E.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UIMP.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than OP7E.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UIMP.DE vs. OP7E.DE - Dividend Comparison

UIMP.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, while OP7E.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OP7E.DE
Ossiam Bloomberg USA PAB UCITS ETF (EUR)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UIMP.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.41%0.82%0.70%0.75%0.92%0.62%0.90%0.97%1.03%1.25%1.26%1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, UIMP.DE and OP7E.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, OP7E.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

OP7E.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for UIMP.DE.

UIMP.DE tracks MSCI USA SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while OP7E.DE tracks Bloomberg PAB US Large & Mid Cap. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for UIMP.DE and 0.12% for OP7E.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UIMP.DE and OP7E.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer