UIM7.DE vs. CSY9.DE
UIM7.DE (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and CSY9.DE (CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD) are both Global Equities funds - UIM7.DE tracks the MSCI World while CSY9.DE tracks the MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, UIM7.DE returned 23.53% vs 9.84% for CSY9.DE. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UIM7.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CSY9.DE.
Performance
UIM7.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UIM7.DE achieves a 12.82% return, which is significantly higher than CSY9.DE's 6.71% return.
UIM7.DE
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- 6M
- 11.29%
- YTD
- 12.82%
- 1Y
- 23.53%
- 3Y*
- 17.89%
- 5Y*
- 12.03%
- 10Y*
- 12.31%
CSY9.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- 6M
- 5.96%
- YTD
- 6.71%
- 1Y
- 9.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UIM7.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
UIM7.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 12.82% | 7.63% | 9.74% |
CSY9.DE CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD | 6.71% | -0.67% | 3.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between UIM7.DE and CSY9.DE is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2024 | 0.61 |
The correlation between UIM7.DE and CSY9.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UIM7.DE vs. CSY9.DE — Risk / Return Rank
UIM7.DE
CSY9.DE
UIM7.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIM7.DE) and CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UIM7.DE | CSY9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.21 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.65 | 2.21 | +1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.53 | 6.28 | +8.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UIM7.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UIM7.DE drawdown since its inception was -61.36%, which is greater than CSY9.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIM7.DE and CSY9.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UIM7.DE | CSY9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.36% | -13.92% | -47.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.42% | -4.48% | -1.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | -0.83% | +0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.66% | -4.63% | -9.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.61% | 1.57% | +0.04% |
Volatility
UIM7.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIM7.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.40% compared to CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE) at 2.21%. This indicates that UIM7.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSY9.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UIM7.DE | CSY9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.40% | 2.21% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.89% | 5.66% | +2.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.25% | 8.17% | +3.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.11% | 10.87% | +3.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.05% | 10.87% | +4.18% |
UIM7.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
UIM7.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CSY9.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
UIM7.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Dividend Comparison
UIM7.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, while CSY9.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSY9.DE CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UIM7.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.88% | 1.04% | 1.06% | 1.29% | 1.47% | 0.98% | 1.31% | 1.56% | 1.69% | 1.72% | 1.83% | 1.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UIM7.DE and CSY9.DE have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSY9.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSY9.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for UIM7.DE.
UIM7.DE tracks MSCI World, while CSY9.DE tracks MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Credit Suisse. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for UIM7.DE and 0.25% for CSY9.DE.
Find the right allocation for UIM7.DE and CSY9.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer