PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UIM5.DE vs. XMK9.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UIM5.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis (UIM5.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 4C EUR Hedged (XMK9.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UIM5.DE achieves a 16.79% return, which is significantly lower than XMK9.DE's 19.57% return. Over the past 10 years, UIM5.DE has underperformed XMK9.DE with an annualized return of 9.20%, while XMK9.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 13.95% annualized return.


UIM5.DE

1D
-0.44%
1M
5.95%
YTD
16.79%
6M
16.65%
1Y
30.63%
3Y*
15.54%
5Y*
10.07%
10Y*
9.20%

XMK9.DE

1D
0.46%
1M
7.79%
YTD
19.57%
6M
21.56%
1Y
50.92%
3Y*
26.94%
5Y*
19.08%
10Y*
13.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UIM5.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UIM5.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis
16.79%12.70%13.66%16.46%-12.43%10.03%5.15%22.27%-9.99%9.08%
XMK9.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 4C EUR Hedged
19.57%27.06%22.49%33.31%-6.05%11.97%7.34%17.42%-16.83%18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between UIM5.DE and XMK9.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2012

0.85

The correlation between UIM5.DE and XMK9.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UIM5.DE vs. XMK9.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UIM5.DE
UIM5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
UIM5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UIM5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
UIM5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
UIM5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
UIM5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

XMK9.DE
XMK9.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
XMK9.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMK9.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMK9.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
XMK9.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMK9.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UIM5.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis (UIM5.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 4C EUR Hedged (XMK9.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UIM5.DEXMK9.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.49

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

5.21

-2.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.82

17.91

-8.09

UIM5.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UIM5.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is lower than the XMK9.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UIM5.DE and XMK9.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UIM5.DEXMK9.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

2.64

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

1.01

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.74

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.70

-0.42

Drawdowns

UIM5.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UIM5.DE drawdown since its inception was -54.88%, which is greater than XMK9.DE's maximum drawdown of -34.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIM5.DE and XMK9.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UIM5.DEXMK9.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.88%

-34.29%

-20.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.08%

-9.72%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.88%

-21.74%

+4.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.02%

-21.74%

+2.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.09%

-34.29%

+6.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

0.00%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.32%

-7.71%

-6.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

2.83%

+0.28%

Volatility

UIM5.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis (UIM5.DE) is 3.41%, while Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 4C EUR Hedged (XMK9.DE) has a volatility of 3.68%. This indicates that UIM5.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMK9.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UIM5.DEXMK9.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

3.68%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.06%

14.80%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.82%

19.21%

-0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.64%

18.65%

-2.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.43%

18.80%

-2.37%

UIM5.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UIM5.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XMK9.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

UIM5.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Dividend Comparison

UIM5.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, while XMK9.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UIM5.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis
1.59%1.71%1.67%1.80%2.11%1.52%1.66%1.65%1.58%1.32%1.54%1.20%
XMK9.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 4C EUR Hedged
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, UIM5.DE and XMK9.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, UIM5.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UIM5.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for XMK9.DE.

Both ETFs track MSCI Japan. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for UIM5.DE and 0.40% for XMK9.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UIM5.DE and XMK9.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer