UIC2.DE vs. 4UBF.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about UBS ETF (LU) Solactive China Technology UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UIC2.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (4UBF.DE).
UIC2.DE and 4UBF.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UIC2.DE is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Solactive China Technology. It was launched on Mar 5, 2021. 4UBF.DE is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable. It was launched on Nov 30, 2017. Both UIC2.DE and 4UBF.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
UIC2.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UIC2.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UIC2.DE UBS ETF (LU) Solactive China Technology UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | -7.77% | 25.73% | 19.00% | -13.83% | -24.39% | -27.46% |
4UBF.DE UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc | -0.46% | 3.23% | 4.51% | 8.22% | -15.67% | -0.28% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UIC2.DE achieves a -7.77% return, which is significantly lower than 4UBF.DE's -0.46% return.
UIC2.DE
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- -7.77%
- 6M
- -22.08%
- 1Y
- -2.65%
- 3Y*
- 4.57%
- 5Y*
- -9.43%
- 10Y*
- —
4UBF.DE
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- -0.46%
- 6M
- -0.45%
- 1Y
- 2.43%
- 3Y*
- 4.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UIC2.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
UIC2.DE has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than 4UBF.DE's 0.13% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UIC2.DE vs. 4UBF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
UIC2.DE
4UBF.DE
UIC2.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Solactive China Technology UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UIC2.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (4UBF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UIC2.DE | 4UBF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | 0.72 | -0.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.14 | 1.03 | -0.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.13 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 0.88 | -0.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.08 | 3.74 | -3.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UIC2.DE | 4UBF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 | 0.72 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.26 | -0.09 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between UIC2.DE and 4UBF.DE is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
UIC2.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither UIC2.DE nor 4UBF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
UIC2.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UIC2.DE drawdown since its inception was -63.35%, which is greater than 4UBF.DE's maximum drawdown of -19.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIC2.DE and 4UBF.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UIC2.DE | 4UBF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.35% | -19.99% | -43.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.64% | -2.88% | -27.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.42% | -3.96% | -36.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.17% | -8.71% | -33.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.06% | 0.68% | +14.38% |
Volatility
UIC2.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) Solactive China Technology UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UIC2.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.81% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (4UBF.DE) at 1.72%. This indicates that UIC2.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 4UBF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UIC2.DE | 4UBF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.81% | 1.72% | +5.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.93% | 2.56% | +24.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.21% | 3.35% | +31.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.67% | 5.02% | +32.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.66% | 5.02% | +32.64% |