PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UIAGX vs. FDSSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UIAGX vs. FDSSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory Aggressive Growth Fund Class I (UIAGX) and Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund (FDSSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UIAGX achieves a 7.97% return, which is significantly lower than FDSSX's 15.71% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UIAGX having a 15.86% annualized return and FDSSX not far behind at 15.28%.


UIAGX

1D
-0.04%
1M
3.37%
YTD
7.97%
6M
5.61%
1Y
22.36%
3Y*
25.23%
5Y*
12.72%
10Y*
15.86%

FDSSX

1D
0.50%
1M
3.18%
YTD
15.71%
6M
15.99%
1Y
37.42%
3Y*
22.95%
5Y*
12.93%
10Y*
15.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UIAGX vs. FDSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UIAGX
Victory Aggressive Growth Fund Class I
7.97%16.92%33.56%48.51%-35.22%16.61%41.84%23.24%-0.71%30.05%
FDSSX
Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund
15.71%18.89%19.79%26.94%-19.55%23.14%24.90%32.21%-8.61%24.42%

Correlation

The correlation between UIAGX and FDSSX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2008

0.92

The correlation between UIAGX and FDSSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UIAGX vs. FDSSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UIAGX
UIAGX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
UIAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UIAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
UIAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
UIAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
UIAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FDSSX
FDSSX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FDSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FDSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UIAGX vs. FDSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Aggressive Growth Fund Class I (UIAGX) and Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund (FDSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UIAGXFDSSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.52

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

4.05

-2.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.13

19.61

-15.48

UIAGX vs. FDSSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UIAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the FDSSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UIAGX and FDSSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UIAGXFDSSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

2.87

-1.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.73

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.83

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.63

-0.08

Drawdowns

UIAGX vs. FDSSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UIAGX drawdown since its inception was -46.08%, smaller than the maximum FDSSX drawdown of -56.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIAGX and FDSSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UIAGXFDSSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.08%

-56.77%

+10.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.16%

-9.19%

-7.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.90%

-20.86%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.68%

-25.22%

-18.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.68%

-34.37%

-9.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.87%

-0.11%

-1.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.84%

-9.88%

+1.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.34%

1.90%

+3.44%

Volatility

UIAGX vs. FDSSX - Volatility Comparison

Victory Aggressive Growth Fund Class I (UIAGX) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund (FDSSX) at 3.41%. This indicates that UIAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UIAGXFDSSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

3.41%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.28%

10.02%

+2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.36%

13.01%

+3.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.36%

17.75%

+6.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.83%

18.57%

+4.26%

UIAGX vs. FDSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UIAGX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than FDSSX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

UIAGX vs. FDSSX - Dividend Comparison

UIAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, less than FDSSX's 4.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDSSX
Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund
4.14%4.79%4.83%2.03%0.36%0.84%5.22%6.09%4.46%3.07%1.04%5.16%
UIAGX
Victory Aggressive Growth Fund Class I
4.01%4.33%5.04%0.00%2.32%11.15%0.18%19.92%18.44%8.75%7.45%6.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, UIAGX and FDSSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

UIAGX has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to FDSSX (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UIAGX dropped -46.08% vs FDSSX's -56.77%.

FDSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UIAGX and FDSSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer