UHYC.L vs. HYFA.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UHYC.L (Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc) and HYFA.L (Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist) are both High Yield Bonds funds - UHYC.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD while HYFA.L tracks the FTSE Time-Weighted US Fallen Angel Bond Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UHYC.L returned 8.55%/yr vs 7.72%/yr for HYFA.L. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UHYC.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for HYFA.L.

Performance

UHYC.L vs. HYFA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (UHYC.L) and Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist (HYFA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UHYC.L achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly higher than HYFA.L's 0.18% return.

UHYC.L

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: 1.10%
• 6M: 1.58%
• 1Y: 6.53%
• 3Y*: 8.55%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HYFA.L

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: -0.28%
• YTD: 0.18%
• 6M: 0.19%
• 1Y: 7.02%
• 3Y*: 7.72%
• 5Y*: 2.50%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UHYC.L vs. HYFA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
UHYC.L Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc	1.10%	8.84%	7.95%	12.03%	0.80%
HYFA.L Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist	0.18%	9.60%	5.19%	10.22%	0.71%

Correlation

The correlation between UHYC.L and HYFA.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022	0.77

The correlation between UHYC.L and HYFA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

UHYC.L vs. HYFA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UHYC.L

UHYC.L Risk / Return Rank: 57
UHYC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
UHYC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
UHYC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 57
UHYC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
UHYC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 61

HYFA.L

HYFA.L Risk / Return Rank: 38
HYFA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
HYFA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
HYFA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 42
HYFA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
HYFA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UHYC.L vs. HYFA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (UHYC.L) and Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist (HYFA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UHYC.L	HYFA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	1.27	+0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.85	1.93	+0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.25	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.43	1.32	+1.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.62	5.57	+5.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UHYC.L vs. HYFA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UHYC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the HYFA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UHYC.L and HYFA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UHYC.L	HYFA.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.83	1.27	+0.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.34	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.16	0.52	+0.64

Drawdowns

UHYC.L vs. HYFA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UHYC.L drawdown since its inception was -9.25%, smaller than the maximum HYFA.L drawdown of -29.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UHYC.L and HYFA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	UHYC.L	HYFA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.25%	-29.37%	+20.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.75%	-5.32%	+2.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.88%	-5.33%	+0.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.12%	-1.18%	+1.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.20%	-3.97%	+2.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.63%	1.26%	-0.63%

Volatility

UHYC.L vs. HYFA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (UHYC.L) is 1.34%, while Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist (HYFA.L) has a volatility of 2.21%. This indicates that UHYC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYFA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UHYC.L	HYFA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.34%	2.21%	-0.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.86%	4.58%	-1.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.66%	5.48%	-1.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.76%	7.44%	-0.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.76%	8.51%	-1.75%

UHYC.L vs. HYFA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UHYC.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than HYFA.L's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

UHYC.L vs. HYFA.L - Dividend Comparison

UHYC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HYFA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.60%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
HYFA.L Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist	6.60%	6.57%	7.05%	6.73%	5.78%	4.63%	5.86%	6.08%	6.18%	5.46%	1.22%
UHYC.L Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UHYC.L and HYFA.L in my portfolio?

UHYC.L and HYFA.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UHYC.L or HYFA.L?

On fees, UHYC.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UHYC.L or HYFA.L?

UHYC.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for HYFA.L.

What is the main difference between UHYC.L and HYFA.L?

UHYC.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while HYFA.L tracks FTSE Time-Weighted US Fallen Angel Bond Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for UHYC.L and 0.45% for HYFA.L.