PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UHYC.L vs. GHYU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UHYC.L vs. GHYU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (UHYC.L) and Lyxor Global High Yield Sustainable Exposure UCITS ETF - Acc (GHYU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UHYC.L achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly higher than GHYU.L's 0.65% return.


UHYC.L

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.08%
YTD
1.10%
6M
1.58%
1Y
6.53%
3Y*
8.55%
5Y*
10Y*

GHYU.L

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
0.65%
6M
1.35%
1Y
5.88%
3Y*
8.58%
5Y*
2.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UHYC.L vs. GHYU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
UHYC.L
Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
1.10%8.84%7.95%12.03%0.80%
GHYU.L
Lyxor Global High Yield Sustainable Exposure UCITS ETF - Acc
0.65%11.40%5.06%12.36%3.74%

Correlation

The correlation between UHYC.L and GHYU.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022

0.75

The correlation between UHYC.L and GHYU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UHYC.L vs. GHYU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UHYC.L
UHYC.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
UHYC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UHYC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
UHYC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
UHYC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
UHYC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

GHYU.L
GHYU.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
GHYU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GHYU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
GHYU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GHYU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GHYU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UHYC.L vs. GHYU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (UHYC.L) and Lyxor Global High Yield Sustainable Exposure UCITS ETF - Acc (GHYU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UHYC.LGHYU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.23

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

1.58

+0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.62

6.21

+4.40

UHYC.L vs. GHYU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UHYC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the GHYU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UHYC.L and GHYU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UHYC.LGHYU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

1.29

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.16

0.41

+0.75

Drawdowns

UHYC.L vs. GHYU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UHYC.L drawdown since its inception was -9.25%, smaller than the maximum GHYU.L drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UHYC.L and GHYU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UHYC.LGHYU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.25%

-22.36%

+13.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.75%

-3.92%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.88%

-4.67%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.49%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.20%

-5.60%

+4.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.63%

1.00%

-0.37%

Volatility

UHYC.L vs. GHYU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (UHYC.L) is 1.34%, while Lyxor Global High Yield Sustainable Exposure UCITS ETF - Acc (GHYU.L) has a volatility of 1.69%. This indicates that UHYC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GHYU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UHYC.LGHYU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.34%

1.69%

-0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.86%

3.74%

-0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.66%

4.83%

-1.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.76%

7.34%

-0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.76%

8.94%

-2.18%

UHYC.L vs. GHYU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UHYC.L and GHYU.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UHYC.L vs. GHYU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither UHYC.L nor GHYU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


UHYC.L and GHYU.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UHYC.L and GHYU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

UHYC.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while GHYU.L tracks ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UHYC.L and GHYU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer