PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UHYC.L vs. EHYG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UHYC.L vs. EHYG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (UHYC.L) and iShares € High Yield Corp Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (EHYG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UHYC.L is traded in USD, while EHYG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the EHYG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UHYC.L achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly lower than EHYG.L's 1.26% return.


UHYC.L

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.08%
YTD
1.10%
6M
1.58%
1Y
6.53%
3Y*
8.55%
5Y*
10Y*

EHYG.L

1D
0.13%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.26%
6M
2.76%
1Y
4.84%
3Y*
11.41%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UHYC.L vs. EHYG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
UHYC.L
Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
1.10%8.84%7.95%7.42%
EHYG.L
iShares € High Yield Corp Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)
1.27%15.98%6.03%10.84%

Correlation

The correlation between UHYC.L and EHYG.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2023

0.50

The correlation between UHYC.L and EHYG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UHYC.L vs. EHYG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UHYC.L
UHYC.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
UHYC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UHYC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
UHYC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
UHYC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
UHYC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

EHYG.L
EHYG.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
EHYG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EHYG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
EHYG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
EHYG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
EHYG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UHYC.L vs. EHYG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (UHYC.L) and iShares € High Yield Corp Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (EHYG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UHYC.LEHYG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.11

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

0.68

+1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.62

2.13

+8.49

UHYC.L vs. EHYG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UHYC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the EHYG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UHYC.L and EHYG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UHYC.LEHYG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

0.59

+1.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.16

1.28

-0.12

Drawdowns

UHYC.L vs. EHYG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UHYC.L drawdown since its inception was -9.25%, which is greater than EHYG.L's maximum drawdown of -7.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UHYC.L and EHYG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UHYC.LEHYG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.25%

-7.96%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.75%

-7.08%

+4.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.88%

-7.96%

+3.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-2.22%

+2.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.20%

-2.00%

+0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.63%

2.27%

-1.64%

Volatility

UHYC.L vs. EHYG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (UHYC.L) is 1.34%, while iShares € High Yield Corp Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (EHYG.L) has a volatility of 2.32%. This indicates that UHYC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EHYG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UHYC.LEHYG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.34%

2.32%

-0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.86%

6.29%

-3.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.66%

8.15%

-4.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.76%

8.55%

-1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.76%

8.55%

-1.79%

UHYC.L vs. EHYG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UHYC.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EHYG.L's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UHYC.L vs. EHYG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither UHYC.L nor EHYG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


UHYC.L and EHYG.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UHYC.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UHYC.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for EHYG.L.

UHYC.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while EHYG.L tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Corporate High Yield ESG SRI Bond Index (EUR). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for UHYC.L and 0.27% for EHYG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UHYC.L and EHYG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer