UHPIX vs. UFPIX
UHPIX (ProFunds UltraShort China) and UFPIX (ProFunds UltraShort Latin America Fund) are both Inverse Equities funds from ProFunds. Over the past 10 years, UHPIX returned -30.50%/yr vs -16.73%/yr for UFPIX. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 1.78% expense ratio.
Performance
UHPIX vs. UFPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UHPIX achieves a 51.66% return, which is significantly higher than UFPIX's -32.58% return. Over the past 10 years, UHPIX has underperformed UFPIX with an annualized return of -30.50%, while UFPIX has yielded a comparatively higher -16.73% annualized return.
UHPIX
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 23.55%
- YTD
- 51.66%
- 6M
- 55.38%
- 1Y
- 15.20%
- 3Y*
- -26.17%
- 5Y*
- -23.80%
- 10Y*
- -30.50%
UFPIX
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- YTD
- -32.58%
- 6M
- -33.36%
- 1Y
- -55.13%
- 3Y*
- 42.81%
- 5Y*
- 10.84%
- 10Y*
- -16.73%
UHPIX vs. UFPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UHPIX ProFunds UltraShort China | 51.66% | -49.82% | -29.87% | -26.13% | -63.62% | 94.89% | -64.76% | -43.34% | 39.47% | -57.67% |
UFPIX ProFunds UltraShort Latin America Fund | -32.58% | -54.35% | 1,093.05% | -43.28% | -35.80% | -20.05% | -38.78% | -27.84% | -3.97% | -45.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between UHPIX and UFPIX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2008 | 0.55 |
Over the past year, the correlation between UHPIX and UFPIX has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UHPIX vs. UFPIX — Risk / Return Rank
UHPIX
UFPIX
UHPIX vs. UFPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX) and ProFunds UltraShort Latin America Fund (UFPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UHPIX | UFPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.75 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.27 | -0.86 | +1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.50 | -1.35 | +1.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UHPIX vs. UFPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UHPIX drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, roughly equal to the maximum UFPIX drawdown of -99.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UHPIX and UFPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UHPIX | UFPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.98% | -99.86% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.95% | -63.51% | +18.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -80.96% | -75.57% | -5.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.64% | -75.57% | -21.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.81% | -95.97% | -2.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.95% | -99.48% | -0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.42% | -93.52% | +0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.07% | 40.60% | -14.53% |
Volatility
UHPIX vs. UFPIX - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX) and ProFunds UltraShort Latin America Fund (UFPIX) have volatilities of 11.67% and 12.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UHPIX | UFPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.67% | 12.00% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.96% | 33.78% | +4.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.67% | 41.49% | +11.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.99% | 339.55% | -256.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 228.63% | 244.33% | -15.70% |
UHPIX vs. UFPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UHPIX and UFPIX have an expense ratio of 1.78%.
Dividends
UHPIX vs. UFPIX - Dividend Comparison
UHPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than UFPIX's 14.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UFPIX ProFunds UltraShort Latin America Fund | 14.11% | 9.52% | 0.00% | 2.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.36% |
UHPIX ProFunds UltraShort China | 2.83% | 4.29% | 0.00% | 3.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UHPIX and UFPIX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UFPIX has higher volatility (12.00%) compared to UHPIX (11.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UHPIX dropped -99.98% vs UFPIX's -99.86%.
UHPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.23 vs -1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UHPIX and UFPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer