UHPIX vs. DXQLX
Compare and contrast key facts about ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX) and Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXQLX).
UHPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Feb 3, 2008. DXQLX is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the . It was launched on May 1, 2006.
Performance
UHPIX vs. DXQLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UHPIX vs. DXQLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UHPIX ProFunds UltraShort China | 30.33% | -49.82% | -29.87% | -26.13% | -63.62% | 94.89% | -64.76% | -43.34% | 39.47% | -57.67% |
DXQLX Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund | -16.65% | 29.99% | 39.26% | 97.59% | -57.72% | 55.98% | 100.94% | 79.36% | -81.54% | 743.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UHPIX achieves a 30.33% return, which is significantly higher than DXQLX's -16.65% return. Over the past 10 years, UHPIX has underperformed DXQLX with an annualized return of -30.64%, while DXQLX has yielded a comparatively higher 28.82% annualized return.
UHPIX
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 20.61%
- YTD
- 30.33%
- 6M
- 70.89%
- 1Y
- 6.73%
- 3Y*
- -23.76%
- 5Y*
- -24.26%
- 10Y*
- -30.64%
DXQLX
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -14.31%
- YTD
- -16.65%
- 6M
- -14.21%
- 1Y
- 28.10%
- 3Y*
- 30.01%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 28.82%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UHPIX vs. DXQLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UHPIX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than DXQLX's 1.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UHPIX vs. DXQLX — Risk / Return Rank
UHPIX
DXQLX
UHPIX vs. DXQLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX) and Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXQLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UHPIX | DXQLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.14 | 0.70 | -0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.61 | 1.31 | -0.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.18 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.23 | 0.99 | -0.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.33 | 3.53 | -3.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UHPIX | DXQLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 | 0.70 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.29 | 0.33 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.10 | 0.09 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.13 | 0.01 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between UHPIX and DXQLX is -0.61. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
UHPIX vs. DXQLX - Dividend Comparison
UHPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than DXQLX's 17.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UHPIX ProFunds UltraShort China | 3.29% | 4.29% | 0.00% | 3.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DXQLX Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund | 17.75% | 14.50% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.75% | 10.90% | 3.37% | 7.37% | 5.72% |
Drawdowns
UHPIX vs. DXQLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UHPIX drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, roughly equal to the maximum DXQLX drawdown of -97.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UHPIX and DXQLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UHPIX | DXQLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.98% | -97.24% | -2.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.89% | -22.05% | -38.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.64% | -60.79% | -35.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.81% | -87.23% | -11.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.96% | -21.88% | -78.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.36% | -66.36% | -27.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.61% | 6.20% | +36.41% |
Volatility
UHPIX vs. DXQLX - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX) has a higher volatility of 15.76% compared to Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXQLX) at 9.63%. This indicates that UHPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXQLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UHPIX | DXQLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.76% | 9.63% | +6.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.13% | 21.96% | +15.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.18% | 40.19% | +17.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.91% | 42.24% | +40.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 320.74% | 316.44% | +4.30% |