PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UGRW.L vs. INTL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UGRW.L vs. INTL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree UK Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF GBP (UGRW.L) and WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UGRW.L achieves a 10.69% return, which is significantly lower than INTL.L's 23.85% return.


UGRW.L

1D
1.61%
1M
5.43%
6M
7.81%
YTD
10.69%
1Y
14.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
525.30%

INTL.L

1D
-1.10%
1M
-13.12%
6M
16.73%
YTD
23.85%
1Y
39.61%
3Y*
19.73%
5Y*
12.03%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
£1.03M£1.15M£1.75M
£13.81K£17.79K£18.51K

UGRW.L vs. INTL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
UGRW.L
WisdomTree UK Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF GBP
10.69%11.29%5.06%10,955.68%
INTL.L
WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc
23.85%14.50%13.58%14.76%

Correlation

The correlation between UGRW.L and INTL.L is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2023

0.40

The correlation between UGRW.L and INTL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UGRW.L vs. INTL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UGRW.L
UGRW.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
UGRW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGRW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGRW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
UGRW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGRW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

INTL.L
INTL.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
INTL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
INTL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UGRW.L vs. INTL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree UK Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF GBP (UGRW.L) and WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UGRW.LINTL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.23

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

2.23

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.81

6.68

-0.88

UGRW.L vs. INTL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UGRW.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the INTL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UGRW.L and INTL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UGRW.L vs. INTL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UGRW.L drawdown since its inception was -15.40%, smaller than the maximum INTL.L drawdown of -37.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGRW.L and INTL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UGRW.LINTL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.40%

-37.71%

+22.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-17.71%

+8.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-17.71%

+17.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.25%

-12.27%

+10.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

5.91%

-3.44%

Volatility

UGRW.L vs. INTL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree UK Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF GBP (UGRW.L) is 3.86%, while WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L) has a volatility of 13.02%. This indicates that UGRW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UGRW.LINTL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

13.02%

-9.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.98%

23.88%

-12.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.15%

29.32%

-16.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6,033.07%

29.58%

+6,003.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6,033.07%

29.48%

+6,003.59%

UGRW.L vs. INTL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UGRW.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than INTL.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

UGRW.L vs. INTL.L - Dividend Comparison

UGRW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, while INTL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


UGRW.L and INTL.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UGRW.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UGRW.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for INTL.L.

UGRW.L is categorized as UK Equities, while INTL.L is Artificial Intelligence. UGRW.L tracks WisdomTree U.K. Quality Dividend Growth Index, while INTL.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for UGRW.L and 0.40% for INTL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UGRW.L and INTL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer