PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UFSD.L vs. ESES.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UFSD.L vs. ESES.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (UFSD.L) and Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets Universal Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ESES.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UFSD.L is traded in USD, while ESES.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ESES.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UFSD.L achieves a 11.69% return, which is significantly lower than ESES.L's 20.00% return.


UFSD.L

1D
-0.89%
1M
0.41%
6M
12.14%
YTD
11.69%
1Y
22.68%
3Y*
18.83%
5Y*
11.60%
10Y*

ESES.L

1D
-1.61%
1M
-7.19%
6M
14.45%
YTD
20.00%
1Y
35.44%
3Y*
19.30%
5Y*
6.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UFSD.L vs. ESES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UFSD.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
11.69%18.12%22.40%17.63%-16.13%9.15%
ESES.L
Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets Universal Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
20.00%33.41%5.75%8.37%-20.64%6,714.49%

Correlation

The correlation between UFSD.L and ESES.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2021

0.56

The correlation between UFSD.L and ESES.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UFSD.L vs. ESES.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UFSD.L
UFSD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
UFSD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UFSD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
UFSD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
UFSD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
UFSD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

ESES.L
ESES.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ESES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
ESES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UFSD.L vs. ESES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (UFSD.L) and Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets Universal Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ESES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UFSD.LESES.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.31

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

2.69

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.19

9.13

+2.06

UFSD.L vs. ESES.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UFSD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the ESES.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UFSD.L and ESES.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UFSD.L vs. ESES.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UFSD.L drawdown since its inception was -35.74%, roughly equal to the maximum ESES.L drawdown of -35.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UFSD.L and ESES.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UFSD.LESES.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.74%

-35.50%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.57%

-13.13%

+5.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.37%

-21.98%

+3.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.88%

-35.02%

+12.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-8.69%

+7.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.56%

-13.86%

+8.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

3.87%

-1.85%

Volatility

UFSD.L vs. ESES.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (UFSD.L) is 2.90%, while Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets Universal Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ESES.L) has a volatility of 7.68%. This indicates that UFSD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UFSD.LESES.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

7.68%

-4.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.30%

18.81%

-9.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.11%

20.87%

-8.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.10%

23.55%

-7.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.55%

3,189.82%

-3,172.27%

UFSD.L vs. ESES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UFSD.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ESES.L's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

UFSD.L vs. ESES.L - Dividend Comparison

UFSD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, while ESES.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ESES.L
Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets Universal Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UFSD.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.79%0.89%0.86%1.12%1.51%0.75%1.11%1.41%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


UFSD.L and ESES.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESES.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESES.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for UFSD.L.

UFSD.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ESES.L is Emerging Markets Equities. UFSD.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while ESES.L tracks MSCI EM Universal Select Business Screens Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for UFSD.L and 0.19% for ESES.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UFSD.L and ESES.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer