UFO vs. VOLT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

UFO (Procure Space ETF) and VOLT (Tema Electrification ETF) are both Global Equities funds. UFO is passively managed, while VOLT is actively managed. Over the past year, UFO returned 76.34% vs 64.69% for VOLT. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

UFO vs. VOLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Procure Space ETF (UFO) and Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UFO achieves a 24.53% return, which is significantly lower than VOLT's 40.29% return.

UFO

• 1D: -1.21%
• 1M: -22.25%
• YTD: 24.53%
• 6M: 20.15%
• 1Y: 76.34%
• 3Y*: 39.04%
• 5Y*: 11.11%
• 10Y*: —

VOLT

• 1D: -3.50%
• 1M: 2.50%
• YTD: 40.29%
• 6M: 38.12%
• 1Y: 64.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UFO vs. VOLT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
UFO Procure Space ETF	24.53%	67.36%	-0.07%
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF	40.29%	25.92%	-8.98%

Correlation

The correlation between UFO and VOLT is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024	0.52

The correlation between UFO and VOLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

UFO vs. VOLT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UFO	VOLT
Industrials	52.2%	47.0%
Communication Services	28.6%	-
Technology	19.3%	12.9%
Financial Services	0.0%	0.5%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	3.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	4.7%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	31.0%

Return for Risk

UFO vs. VOLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UFO

UFO Risk / Return Rank: 54
UFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
UFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
UFO Omega Ratio Rank: 48
UFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
UFO Martin Ratio Rank: 54

VOLT

VOLT Risk / Return Rank: 89
VOLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
VOLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
VOLT Omega Ratio Rank: 85
VOLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
VOLT Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UFO vs. VOLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Procure Space ETF (UFO) and Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UFO	VOLT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	2.99	-1.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	3.71	-1.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.49	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	6.78	-4.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.06	18.99	-9.94

UFO vs. VOLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UFO Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is lower than the VOLT Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UFO and VOLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UFO vs. VOLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UFO drawdown since its inception was -50.33%, which is greater than VOLT's maximum drawdown of -23.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UFO and VOLT.

Drawdown Indicators

	UFO	VOLT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.33%	-23.40%	-26.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.02%	-9.59%	-19.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.02%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.02%	-3.50%	-25.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.81%	-5.14%	-16.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.46%	3.42%	+5.04%

Volatility

UFO vs. VOLT - Volatility Comparison

Procure Space ETF (UFO) has a higher volatility of 19.63% compared to Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) at 9.40%. This indicates that UFO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UFO	VOLT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.63%	9.40%	+10.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.65%	18.29%	+15.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.71%	21.75%	+18.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.64%	24.55%	+6.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.16%	24.55%	+6.61%

UFO vs. VOLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UFO and VOLT have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

UFO vs. VOLT - Dividend Comparison

UFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, more than VOLT's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
UFO Procure Space ETF	0.34%	0.46%	1.98%	1.90%	3.19%	1.00%	1.07%	0.45%
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF	0.32%	0.46%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UFO and VOLT in my portfolio?

UFO and VOLT have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UFO or VOLT?

UFO has higher volatility (19.63%) compared to VOLT (9.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UFO dropped -50.33% vs VOLT's -23.40%.

Which ETF is better, UFO or VOLT?

On 1-year performance, UFO leads with 76.34% vs 64.69% for VOLT. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, VOLT has been the lower-risk option at 9.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UFO or VOLT?

Over the 1-year period, UFO has performed better with a 76.34% return vs 64.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UFO or VOLT?

UFO and VOLT have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UFO or VOLT?

UFO has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.32% for VOLT.

What is the main difference between UFO and VOLT?

They also come from different issuers: ProcureAM and Tema.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.