UFO vs. ORBX
UFO (Procure Space ETF) and ORBX (Global X Space Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UFO is a Global Equities fund tracking the S-Network Space Index, while ORBX is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the Global X Space Tech Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. UFO charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for ORBX.
Performance
UFO vs. ORBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
UFO
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- -22.25%
- YTD
- 24.53%
- 6M
- 20.15%
- 1Y
- 76.34%
- 3Y*
- 39.04%
- 5Y*
- 11.11%
- 10Y*
- —
ORBX
- 1D
- -2.53%
- 1M
- -27.90%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UFO vs. ORBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
UFO Procure Space ETF | -6.85% |
ORBX Global X Space Tech ETF | -2.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between UFO and ORBX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2026 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UFO vs. ORBX — Risk / Return Rank
UFO
ORBX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UFO vs. ORBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Procure Space ETF (UFO) and Global X Space Tech ETF (ORBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UFO | ORBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.06 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UFO vs. ORBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UFO drawdown since its inception was -50.33%, which is greater than ORBX's maximum drawdown of -35.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UFO and ORBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UFO | ORBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.33% | -35.85% | -14.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.02% | -35.85% | +6.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.81% | -11.09% | -10.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.46% | — | — |
Volatility
UFO vs. ORBX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UFO | ORBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.63% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.65% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.71% | 81.94% | -41.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.64% | 81.94% | -51.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.16% | 81.94% | -50.78% |
UFO vs. ORBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UFO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ORBX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
UFO vs. ORBX - Dividend Comparison
UFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, while ORBX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ORBX Global X Space Tech ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UFO Procure Space ETF | 0.34% | 0.46% | 1.98% | 1.90% | 3.19% | 1.00% | 1.07% | 0.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, UFO and ORBX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ORBX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ORBX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UFO.
UFO has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.00% for ORBX.
UFO is categorized as Global Equities, while ORBX is Aerospace & Defense. UFO tracks S-Network Space Index, while ORBX tracks Global X Space Tech Index. They also come from different issuers: ProcureAM and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for UFO and 0.50% for ORBX.
Find the right allocation for UFO and ORBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer