PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UFIV vs. ZROZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UFIV vs. ZROZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF (UFIV) and PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund (ZROZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UFIV achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly lower than ZROZ's 0.97% return.


UFIV

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.10%
YTD
-0.73%
6M
-0.68%
1Y
2.30%
3Y*
3.23%
5Y*
10Y*

ZROZ

1D
-1.20%
1M
4.33%
YTD
0.97%
6M
0.53%
1Y
3.18%
3Y*
-7.55%
5Y*
-11.93%
10Y*
-4.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UFIV vs. ZROZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
UFIV
F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF
-0.73%6.89%1.09%1.80%
ZROZ
PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund
0.97%-1.84%-16.18%-4.95%

Correlation

The correlation between UFIV and ZROZ is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2023

0.76

The correlation between UFIV and ZROZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UFIV vs. ZROZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UFIV
UFIV Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
UFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
UFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
UFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
UFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

ZROZ
ZROZ Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
ZROZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZROZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZROZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
ZROZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZROZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UFIV vs. ZROZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF (UFIV) and PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund (ZROZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UFIVZROZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.04

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

0.23

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.29

0.50

+1.79

UFIV vs. ZROZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UFIV Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is higher than the ZROZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UFIV and ZROZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UFIV vs. ZROZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UFIV drawdown since its inception was -5.63%, smaller than the maximum ZROZ drawdown of -62.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UFIV and ZROZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UFIVZROZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.63%

-62.93%

+57.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.71%

-14.02%

+11.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.03%

-28.62%

+24.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.20%

-59.10%

+56.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.56%

-24.14%

+22.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

6.39%

-5.38%

Volatility

UFIV vs. ZROZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF (UFIV) is 0.99%, while PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund (ZROZ) has a volatility of 3.60%. This indicates that UFIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZROZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UFIVZROZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

3.60%

-2.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.36%

10.77%

-8.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.20%

15.76%

-12.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.37%

23.83%

-19.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.37%

22.06%

-17.69%

UFIV vs. ZROZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UFIV and ZROZ have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UFIV vs. ZROZ - Dividend Comparison

UFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, less than ZROZ's 5.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UFIV
F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF
3.58%3.66%4.00%2.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZROZ
PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund
5.04%4.96%4.58%3.52%2.76%1.60%1.68%2.22%2.06%2.53%3.00%2.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


UFIV and ZROZ have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZROZ has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to UFIV (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UFIV dropped -5.63% vs ZROZ's -62.93%.

On 3-year performance, UFIV leads with 3.23% vs -7.55% for ZROZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, UFIV has been the lower-risk option at 0.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, UFIV has performed better with a 3.23% return vs -7.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UFIV and ZROZ have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

ZROZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.04%, compared with 3.58% for UFIV.

UFIV tracks ICE BofA Current 5-Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while ZROZ tracks ICE BofA Long U.S. Treasury Principal STRIPS Index. They also come from different issuers: US Benchmark Series and PIMCO.

UFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UFIV and ZROZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer