PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UFIV vs. VETZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UFIV vs. VETZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF (UFIV) and Academy Veteran Bond ETF (VETZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UFIV achieves a -0.91% return, which is significantly lower than VETZ's -0.34% return.


UFIV

1D
-0.20%
1M
-0.63%
6M
-0.93%
YTD
-0.91%
1Y
0.67%
3Y*
3.42%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.61%

VETZ

1D
-0.74%
1M
-1.59%
6M
-0.89%
YTD
-0.34%
1Y
3.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$406.18K$300.38K$296.57K
$1.58M$821.90K$556.10K

UFIV vs. VETZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
UFIV
F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF
-0.91%6.89%1.09%3.32%
VETZ
Academy Veteran Bond ETF
-0.34%8.02%2.22%3.84%

Correlation

The correlation between UFIV and VETZ is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2023

0.78

The correlation between UFIV and VETZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UFIV vs. VETZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UFIV
UFIV Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
UFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
UFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
UFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
UFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

VETZ
VETZ Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
VETZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VETZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
VETZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
VETZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
VETZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UFIV vs. VETZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF (UFIV) and Academy Veteran Bond ETF (VETZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UFIVVETZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.15

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

1.50

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.34

4.39

-3.05

UFIV vs. VETZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UFIV Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the VETZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UFIV and VETZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UFIV vs. VETZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UFIV drawdown since its inception was -5.63%, which is greater than VETZ's maximum drawdown of -5.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UFIV and VETZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UFIVVETZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.63%

-5.16%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.71%

-2.73%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.03%

-5.16%

+1.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.38%

-2.33%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.58%

-1.30%

-0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

0.93%

+0.28%

Volatility

UFIV vs. VETZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF (UFIV) is 0.82%, while Academy Veteran Bond ETF (VETZ) has a volatility of 1.36%. This indicates that UFIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VETZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UFIVVETZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.82%

1.36%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.47%

3.36%

-0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.17%

4.69%

-1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.33%

6.08%

-1.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.33%

6.08%

-1.75%

UFIV vs. VETZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

UFIV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than VETZ's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

UFIV vs. VETZ - Dividend Comparison

UFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, less than VETZ's 6.14% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
UFIV
F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF
3.62%3.66%4.00%2.96%
VETZ
Academy Veteran Bond ETF
5.63%6.14%5.89%1.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


UFIV and VETZ have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VETZ has higher volatility (1.36%) compared to UFIV (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UFIV dropped -5.63% vs VETZ's -5.16%.

On 1-year performance, VETZ leads with 3.17% vs 0.67% for UFIV. On fees, UFIV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, UFIV has been the lower-risk option at 0.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VETZ has performed better with a 3.17% return vs 0.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UFIV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for VETZ.

VETZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.63%, compared with 3.62% for UFIV.

UFIV is categorized as Government Bonds, while VETZ is Mortgage Backed Securities. They also come from different issuers: US Benchmark Series and Academy. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UFIV and 0.35% for VETZ.

VETZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UFIV and VETZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer