UFIV vs. SPTB

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UFIV (F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF) and SPTB (State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - UFIV tracks the ICE BofA Current 5-Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross while SPTB tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, UFIV returned 2.59% vs 3.36% for SPTB. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UFIV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTB.

Performance

UFIV vs. SPTB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF (UFIV) and State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF (SPTB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UFIV achieves a -0.49% return, which is significantly lower than SPTB's 0.04% return.

UFIV

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -0.17%
• YTD: -0.49%
• 6M: -0.41%
• 1Y: 2.59%
• 3Y*: 3.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPTB

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.04%
• YTD: 0.04%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 3.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UFIV vs. SPTB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
UFIV F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF	-0.49%	6.89%	2.35%
SPTB State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF	0.04%	6.14%	2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between UFIV and SPTB is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2024	0.95

The correlation between UFIV and SPTB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

UFIV vs. SPTB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UFIV

UFIV Risk / Return Rank: 23
UFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
UFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
UFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 22
UFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
UFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 23

SPTB

SPTB Risk / Return Rank: 26
SPTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
SPTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
SPTB Omega Ratio Rank: 24
SPTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
SPTB Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UFIV vs. SPTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF (UFIV) and State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF (SPTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UFIV	SPTB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.82	0.94	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.23	1.41	-0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.16	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.96	1.16	-0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.85	3.43	-0.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UFIV vs. SPTB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UFIV Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is comparable to the SPTB Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UFIV and SPTB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UFIV	SPTB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82	0.94	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.93	-0.29

Drawdowns

UFIV vs. SPTB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UFIV drawdown since its inception was -5.63%, which is greater than SPTB's maximum drawdown of -4.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UFIV and SPTB.

Drawdown Indicators

	UFIV	SPTB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.63%	-4.96%	-0.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.71%	-2.90%	+0.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.96%	-1.84%	-0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.56%	-1.32%	-0.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.91%	0.98%	-0.07%

Volatility

UFIV vs. SPTB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF (UFIV) is 1.01%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF (SPTB) has a volatility of 1.11%. This indicates that UFIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UFIV	SPTB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.01%	1.11%	-0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.24%	2.47%	-0.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.20%	3.64%	-0.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.37%	4.41%	-0.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.37%	4.41%	-0.04%

UFIV vs. SPTB - Expense Ratio Comparison

UFIV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

UFIV vs. SPTB - Dividend Comparison

UFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, less than SPTB's 4.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
SPTB State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF	4.20%	4.23%	2.76%	0.00%
UFIV F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF	3.57%	3.66%	4.00%	2.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UFIV and SPTB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, UFIV and SPTB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, UFIV or SPTB?

SPTB has higher volatility (1.11%) compared to UFIV (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UFIV dropped -5.63% vs SPTB's -4.96%.

Which ETF is better, UFIV or SPTB?

On 1-year performance, SPTB leads with 3.36% vs 2.59% for UFIV. On fees, SPTB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, UFIV has been the lower-risk option at 1.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UFIV or SPTB?

Over the 1-year period, SPTB has performed better with a 3.36% return vs 2.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UFIV or SPTB?

SPTB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for UFIV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UFIV or SPTB?

SPTB has the higher dividend yield at 4.20%, compared with 3.57% for UFIV.

What is the main difference between UFIV and SPTB?

UFIV tracks ICE BofA Current 5-Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SPTB tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: US Benchmark Series and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UFIV and 0.03% for SPTB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPTB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.