UFIV vs. NVDA
UFIV (F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA Current 5-Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, UFIV returned 3.26%/yr vs 68.08%/yr for NVDA. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
UFIV vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UFIV achieves a -0.63% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 7.39% return.
UFIV
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- -0.63%
- 6M
- -0.45%
- 1Y
- 2.11%
- 3Y*
- 3.26%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDA
- 1D
- -4.13%
- 1M
- -6.99%
- YTD
- 7.39%
- 6M
- 5.85%
- 1Y
- 38.94%
- 3Y*
- 68.08%
- 5Y*
- 59.90%
- 10Y*
- 67.94%
UFIV vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
UFIV F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF | -0.63% | 6.89% | 1.09% | 1.80% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 7.39% | 38.92% | 171.25% | 86.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between UFIV and NVDA is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2023 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UFIV vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank
UFIV
NVDA
UFIV vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF (UFIV) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UFIV | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.20 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.78 | 1.94 | -1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.08 | 4.51 | -2.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UFIV vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UFIV drawdown since its inception was -5.63%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UFIV and NVDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UFIV | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.63% | -89.72% | +84.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.71% | -20.21% | +17.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.03% | -36.88% | +32.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -66.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.10% | -15.04% | +12.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.56% | -36.16% | +34.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.02% | 8.66% | -7.64% |
Volatility
UFIV vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF (UFIV) is 1.00%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 13.29%. This indicates that UFIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UFIV | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.00% | 13.29% | -12.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.35% | 26.92% | -24.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.19% | 35.50% | -32.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.37% | 51.84% | -47.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.37% | 49.87% | -45.50% |
Dividends
UFIV vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
UFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.14% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
UFIV F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF | 3.57% | 3.66% | 4.00% | 2.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UFIV and NVDA have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDA has higher volatility (13.29%) compared to UFIV (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UFIV dropped -5.63% vs NVDA's -89.72%.
NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UFIV and NVDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer