PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UETW.DE vs. UIQ1.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UETW.DE vs. UIQ1.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (UETW.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (UIQ1.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UETW.DE achieves a 10.95% return, which is significantly lower than UIQ1.DE's 22.64% return.


UETW.DE

1D
-0.01%
1M
3.72%
YTD
10.95%
6M
10.99%
1Y
23.94%
3Y*
17.68%
5Y*
12.87%
10Y*

UIQ1.DE

1D
-1.00%
1M
1.33%
YTD
22.64%
6M
25.07%
1Y
38.99%
3Y*
15.74%
5Y*
10.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UETW.DE vs. UIQ1.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
UETW.DE
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) Acc
10.95%8.06%26.50%19.68%-13.72%32.17%5.50%12.54%
UIQ1.DE
UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
22.64%17.35%4.90%-7.27%9.59%33.73%-4.28%5.61%

Correlation

The correlation between UETW.DE and UIQ1.DE is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2019

0.25

The correlation between UETW.DE and UIQ1.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UETW.DE vs. UIQ1.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UETW.DE
UETW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
UETW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UETW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
UETW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
UETW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
UETW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

UIQ1.DE
UIQ1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
UIQ1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UIQ1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
UIQ1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
UIQ1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
UIQ1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UETW.DE vs. UIQ1.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (UETW.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (UIQ1.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UETW.DEUIQ1.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.47

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.67

5.99

-2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.61

16.75

-2.14

UETW.DE vs. UIQ1.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UETW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the UIQ1.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UETW.DE and UIQ1.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UETW.DEUIQ1.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

2.64

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.59

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.51

+0.33

Drawdowns

UETW.DE vs. UIQ1.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UETW.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, smaller than the maximum UIQ1.DE drawdown of -39.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UETW.DE and UIQ1.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UETW.DEUIQ1.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.72%

-39.99%

+6.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-6.62%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.30%

-13.55%

-7.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.30%

-30.51%

+9.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-2.05%

+1.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.63%

-15.09%

+10.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

2.37%

-0.74%

Volatility

UETW.DE vs. UIQ1.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (UETW.DE) is 2.60%, while UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (UIQ1.DE) has a volatility of 3.79%. This indicates that UETW.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UIQ1.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UETW.DEUIQ1.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.60%

3.79%

-1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.63%

12.91%

-5.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.97%

15.03%

-4.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.03%

18.19%

-4.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.11%

17.45%

-1.34%

UETW.DE vs. UIQ1.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UETW.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than UIQ1.DE's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

UETW.DE vs. UIQ1.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither UETW.DE nor UIQ1.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


UETW.DE and UIQ1.DE have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UETW.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UETW.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UIQ1.DE.

UETW.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while UIQ1.DE is Commodities. UETW.DE tracks MSCI World, while UIQ1.DE tracks UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped (EUR Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.10% for UETW.DE and 0.34% for UIQ1.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UETW.DE and UIQ1.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer