UETW.DE vs. UEQU.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UETW.DE (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) Acc) and UEQU.DE (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both exchange-traded funds - UETW.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World, while UEQU.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UETW.DE returned 12.87%/yr vs 14.40%/yr for UEQU.DE. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UETW.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for UEQU.DE.

Performance

UETW.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (UETW.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UEQU.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UETW.DE achieves a 10.95% return, which is significantly lower than UEQU.DE's 25.53% return.

UETW.DE

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 3.72%
• YTD: 10.95%
• 6M: 10.99%
• 1Y: 23.94%
• 3Y*: 17.68%
• 5Y*: 12.87%
• 10Y*: —

UEQU.DE

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: 2.99%
• YTD: 25.53%
• 6M: 26.95%
• 1Y: 40.51%
• 3Y*: 14.81%
• 5Y*: 14.40%
• 10Y*: 10.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UETW.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
UETW.DE UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) Acc	10.95%	8.06%	26.50%	19.68%	-13.72%	32.17%	5.50%	12.54%
UEQU.DE UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	25.53%	6.36%	13.03%	-8.33%	20.34%	46.31%	-10.57%	8.76%

Correlation

The correlation between UETW.DE and UEQU.DE is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2019	0.29

Over the past year, the correlation between UETW.DE and UEQU.DE has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

UETW.DE vs. UEQU.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UETW.DE

UETW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 71
UETW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
UETW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
UETW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 69
UETW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
UETW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 77

UEQU.DE

UEQU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 82
UEQU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
UEQU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
UEQU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 79
UEQU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
UEQU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UETW.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (UETW.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UEQU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UETW.DE	UEQU.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	2.60	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	3.40	-0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.46	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.67	6.29	-2.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.61	15.25	-0.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UETW.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UETW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the UEQU.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UETW.DE and UEQU.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UETW.DE	UEQU.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.17	2.60	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91	0.85	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	0.64	+0.20

Drawdowns

UETW.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UETW.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, which is greater than UEQU.DE's maximum drawdown of -30.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UETW.DE and UEQU.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	UETW.DE	UEQU.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.72%	-30.56%	-3.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.47%	-6.50%	+0.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.30%	-15.66%	-5.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.30%	-22.44%	+1.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.30%	-1.21%	+0.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.63%	-8.92%	+4.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.63%	2.69%	-1.06%

Volatility

UETW.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (UETW.DE) is 2.60%, while UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UEQU.DE) has a volatility of 3.91%. This indicates that UETW.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UEQU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UETW.DE	UEQU.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.60%	3.91%	-1.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.63%	13.03%	-5.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.97%	15.73%	-4.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.03%	16.83%	-2.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.11%	16.41%	-0.30%

UETW.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UETW.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than UEQU.DE's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

UETW.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither UETW.DE nor UEQU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UETW.DE and UEQU.DE in my portfolio?

UETW.DE and UEQU.DE have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UETW.DE or UEQU.DE?

On fees, UETW.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UETW.DE or UEQU.DE?

UETW.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UEQU.DE.

What is the main difference between UETW.DE and UEQU.DE?

UETW.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while UEQU.DE is Commodities. UETW.DE tracks MSCI World, while UEQU.DE tracks UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for UETW.DE and 0.34% for UEQU.DE.