PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UETE.DE vs. GACB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UETE.DE vs. GACB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets SRI UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (UETE.DE) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GACB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


UETE.DE

1D
-0.29%
1M
2.07%
YTD
35.33%
6M
37.80%
1Y
55.15%
3Y*
25.08%
5Y*
9.62%
10Y*

GACB.DE

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UETE.DE vs. GACB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
UETE.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets SRI UCITS ETF (USD) Acc
35.33%21.01%16.13%2.59%-15.04%7.14%5.67%4.41%
GACB.DE
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.)
4.67%17.63%13.29%6.39%-14.87%7.59%1.72%-6.33%

Correlation

The correlation between UETE.DE and GACB.DE is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2019

0.85

The correlation between UETE.DE and GACB.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UETE.DE vs. GACB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UETE.DE
UETE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
UETE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UETE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
UETE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
UETE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
UETE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

GACB.DE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UETE.DE vs. GACB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets SRI UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (UETE.DE) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GACB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UETE.DEGACB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.90

UETE.DE vs. GACB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UETE.DE vs. GACB.DE - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UETE.DEGACB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

Volatility

UETE.DE vs. GACB.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UETE.DEGACB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.08%

UETE.DE vs. GACB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UETE.DE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than GACB.DE's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

UETE.DE vs. GACB.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither UETE.DE nor GACB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


UETE.DE and GACB.DE have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UETE.DE is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UETE.DE is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for GACB.DE.

UETE.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while GACB.DE tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for UETE.DE and 0.49% for GACB.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UETE.DE and GACB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer